Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31504698›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2021

Dating and relationship violence victimization and perpetration among 11-16 year olds in Wales: a cross-sectional analysis of the School Health Research Network (SHRN) survey.

Honor Young, Sara Jayne Long, G J Melendez-Torres, Hyun Sue Kim, Gillian Hewitt, Simon Murphy, Graham F Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of the Economics of School-Based Interventions for Dating Violence and Gender-Based Violence.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Honor YoungDECIPHer, UKCRC Centre of Excellence, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, UK.
Sara Jayne LongDECIPHer, UKCRC Centre of Excellence, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, UK.
G J Melendez-TorresDECIPHer, UKCRC Centre of Excellence, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, UK.
Hyun Sue KimDECIPHer, UKCRC Centre of Excellence, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, UK.
Gillian HewittDECIPHer, UKCRC Centre of Excellence, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, UK.
Simon MurphyDECIPHer, UKCRC Centre of Excellence, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, UK.
Graham F MooreDECIPHer, UKCRC Centre of Excellence, Cardiff University, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/L002787/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examines the prevalence of dating and relationship violence (DRV) victimization, perpetration and joint victimization and perpetration, and associations between DRV and socio-demographic characteristics.

methodsCross-sectional self-report data from 74 908 students aged 11-16 from 193 schools across Wales were collected and analysed using generalized estimating equations to examine prevalence and predictors of emotional and physical DRV victimization, perpetration and joint victimization and perpetration.

resultsMore girls reported emotional victimization (28%) and perpetration (18%) than boys (20% and 16%, respectively). More girls (8%) than boys (7%) reported physical perpetration. However, boys (17%) reported more physical victimization than girls (12%). Age-related trajectories of DRV victimization and perpetration were stronger in girls than in boys. Students from single or step parent homes, those in care, and certain ethnic minority groups had increased odds of DRV. No association was found between socioeconomic status and DRV.

conclusionsAge-related trajectories and the lack of social patterning by socioeconomic status point to the value of early, universal interventions, while some evidence of ethnic patterning and family structure-related risk factors suggest areas for further research and targeted interventions. DRV continues to be a major public health problem for which little UK-specific intervention evidence exists.

Indexed as

Crime VictimsEthnicityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMinority GroupsSchoolsViolenceWalesrelationshipsviolenceyoung people

Identifiers

PMID31504698
PMCPMC8042367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.