Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31504587›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2019

Evaluation of in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Qatar.

Mazen A Sid Ahmed, Hamad Abdel Hadi, Abubaker A I Hassan, Sulieman Abu Jarir, Muna A Al-Maslamani, Nahla Omer Eltai, Khalid M Dousa, Andrea M Hujer, Ali A Sultan, Bo Soderquist and 4 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation ofJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022
    Article
  13. Association ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  15. Genomic Characterization of Mutli-Drug ResistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Prevalence and microbiological and genetic characteristics of multidrug-resistantAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022
    Article
  17. The ERACE-PA Global Surveillance Program: Ceftolozane/tazobactam and Ceftazidime/avibactam in vitro Activity against a Global Collection of Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mazen A Sid AhmedMicrobiology Division, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Hamad Abdel HadiCommunicable Diseases Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Abubaker A I HassanDivision of General Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sulieman Abu JarirCommunicable Diseases Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Muna A Al-MaslamaniCommunicable Diseases Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Nahla Omer EltaiBiomedical Research Center, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Khalid M DousaUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Andrea M HujerDepartment of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ali A SultanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Bo SoderquistThe Life Science Centre, School of Science and Technology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Robert A BonomoDepartment of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Emad Bashir IbrahimMicrobiology Division, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Jana JassThe Life Science Centre, School of Science and Technology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Ali S OmraniCommunicable Diseases Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

Understanding B-Lactam Resistance in Acinetobacter baumanniiR01AI072219 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT A. BONOMO, Philip N. Rather · 2007 to 2026
$6.6M
Understanding ceftazidime resistance in SHV B-LactamasesR01AI063517 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BONOMO, ROBERT A. · 2005 to 2023
$4.9M
A Mechanism-Based Approach to Metallo-beta-Lactamase InhibitionR01AI100560 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BONOMO, ROBERT A., SPENCER, JAMES · 2012 to 2022
$4.4M
The Continuing Challenge of Carbapenemases in K. pneumoniae: KPC-2 & NDM-1I01BX001974 · VA · LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BONOMO, ROBERT A. · 2013 to 2024
–
BLRD VA I01 BX001974NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063517NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072219NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI100560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam against clinical isolates of MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Qatar, as well as the mechanisms of resistance.

methodsMDR P. aeruginosa isolated between October 2014 and September 2015 from all public hospitals in Qatar were included. The BD PhoenixTM system was used for identification and initial antimicrobial susceptibility testing, while Liofilchem MIC Test Strips (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) were used for confirmation of ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptibility. Ten ceftazidime/avibactam- and/or ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant isolates were randomly selected for WGS.

resultsA total of 205 MDR P. aeruginosa isolates were included. Of these, 141 (68.8%) were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, 129 (62.9%) were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, 121 (59.0%) were susceptible to both and 56 (27.3%) were susceptible to neither. Twenty (9.8%) isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam but not to ceftolozane/tazobactam and only 8 (3.9%) were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam but not to ceftazidime/avibactam. Less than 50% of XDR isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam or ceftolozane/tazobactam. The 10 sequenced isolates belonged to six different STs and all produced AmpC and OXA enzymes; 5 (50%) produced ESBL and 4 (40%) produced VIM enzymes.

conclusionsMDR P. aeruginosa susceptibility rates to ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam were higher than those to all existing antipseudomonal agents, except colistin, but were less than 50% in extremely resistant isolates. Non-susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam was largely due to the production of ESBL and VIM enzymes. Ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam are possible options for some patients with MDR P. aeruginosa in Qatar.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidimeCephalosporinsDrug CombinationsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsQatarTazobactamWhole Genome SequencingAnti-Bacterial Agentsavibactam, ceftazidime drug combinationAzabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidimeceftolozane, tazobactam drug combinationCephalosporinsDrug CombinationsTazobactam

Identifiers

PMID31504587
PMCPMC6857196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.