ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2019
Ambient air pollution and in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between ambient air pollution exposure and pregnancy outcomes in women treated with assisted reproductive technology: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Association between ambient temperature exposure and pregnancy outcomes in participants undergoing IVF: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Protecting laboratory air quality and comparing clinical assisted reproductive technology cycle outcomes before, during and after wildfire events: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Associations of mixed exposure to ambient air pollution and environmental factors with the risk of miscarriage in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Maternal exposure to fine particulate matter and pregnancy outcomes in women undergoingEco-Environment & Health · 2025Article
- Meta-analysis of studies testing the association between air pollution and live birth rates in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology.Toxicology research · 2025Review
- Associations of maternal PM2.5 exposure with preterm birth and miscarriage in women undergoingFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Observed Effects on Very Early Pregnancy Linked to Ambient PMEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Very Early Pregnancy Loss: The Role of PMEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Air pollution exposure in vitrified oocyte donors and male recipient partners in relation to fertilization and embryo quality.Environment international · 2024Article
- Long term exposure to road traffic noise and air pollution and risk of infertility in men and women: nationwide Danish cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
- Association of ambient air pollutant mixtures with IVF/ICSI-ET clinical pregnancy rates during critical exposure periods.Human reproduction open · 2024Article
- Implications of Exposure to Air Pollution on Male Reproduction: The Role of Oxidative Stress.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Air pollution and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort study.Environment international · 2023Article
- Association between traffic-related air pollution exposure and fertility-assisted births.Environmental research, health : ERH · 2023Article
- Effects of air pollution on clinical pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilisation (IVF): a retrospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Poor ovarian response is associated with air pollutants: A multicentre study in China.EBioMedicine · 2022Article
- Association Between Neighborhood Disadvantage and Fertility Among Pregnancy Planners in the US.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Fine particulate matter and polycystic ovarian morphology.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2022Article
- Periconception air pollution, metabolomic biomarkers, and fertility among women undergoing assisted reproduction.Environment international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
study questionIs air pollution associated with IVF treatment outcomes in the USA? SUMMARY ANSWER: We did not find clear evidence of a meaningful association between reproductive outcomes and average daily concentrations of particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5) and ozone (O3). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Maternal exposure to air pollution such as PM2.5, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide or O3 may increase risks for adverse perinatal outcomes. Findings from the few studies using data from IVF populations to investigate associations between specific pollutants and treatment outcomes are inconclusive. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: Retrospective cohort study of 253 528 non-cancelled fresh, autologous IVF cycles including 230 243 fresh, autologous IVF cycles with a transfer of ≥1 embryo was performed between 2010 and 2012. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsWe linked 2010-2012 National ART Surveillance System data for fresh, autologous IVF cycles with the ambient air pollution data generated using a Bayesian fusion model available through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Environmental Public Health Tracking Network. We calculated county-level average daily PM2.5 and O3 concentrations for three time periods: cycle start to oocyte retrieval (T1), oocyte retrieval to embryo transfer (T2) and embryo transfer +14 days (T3). Multivariable predicted marginal proportions from logistic and log-linear regression models were used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and 95% CI for the association between reproductive outcomes (implantation rate, pregnancy and live birth) and interquartile increases in PM2.5 and O3. The multipollutant models were also adjusted for patients and treatment characteristics and accounted for clustering by clinic and county of residence. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: For all exposure periods, O3 was weakly positively associated with implantation (aRR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.02 for T1; aRR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.02 for T2 and aRR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.02 for T3) and live birth (aRR 1.01, 95% CI 1.002-1.02 for T1; aRR 1.01, 95% CI 1.004-1.02 for T2 and aRR 1.02, 95% CI 1.004-1.03 for T3). PM2.5 was not associated with any of the reproductive outcomes assessed. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main limitation of this study is the use of aggregated air pollution data as proxies for individual exposure. The weak positive associations found in this study might be related to confounding by factors that we were unable to assess and may not reflect clinically meaningful differences. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsMore research is needed to assess the impact of air pollution on reproductive function. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.