ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019
Molecular Evolution in Small Steps under Prevailing Negative Selection: A Nearly Universal Rule of Codon Substitution.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Mitogenome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Detecting Convergence of Amino Acid Physicochemical Properties Underlying the Organismal Adaptive Convergent Evolution.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Amino Acid Properties, Substitution Rates, and the Nearly Neutral Theory.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Characterization of cancer-driving nucleotides (CDNs) across genes, cancer types, and patients.eLife · 2024Article
- Article
- A fitness distribution law for amino-acid replacements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Two decades of suspect evidence for adaptive molecular evolution-negative selection confounding positive-selection signals.National science review · 2022Article
- Convergent adaptation of the genomes of woody plants at the land-sea interface.National science review · 2020Article
- Amino acid exchangeabilities vary across the tree of life.Science advances · 2019Article
- Tumorigenesis as the Paradigm of Quasi-neutral Molecular Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widely accepted view that evolution proceeds in small steps is based on two premises: 1) negative selection acts strongly against large differences and 2) positive selection favors small-step changes. The two premises are not biologically connected and should be evaluated separately. We now extend a previous approach to studying codon evolution in the entire genome. Codon substitution rate is a function of the physicochemical distance between amino acids (AAs), equated with the step size of evolution. Between nine pairs of closely related species of plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates, the evolutionary rate is strongly and negatively correlated with a set of AA distances (ΔU, scaled to [0, 1]). ΔU, a composite measure of evolutionary rates across diverse taxa, is influenced by almost all of the 48 physicochemical properties used here. The new analyses reveal a crucial trend hidden from previous studies: ΔU is strongly correlated with the evolutionary rate (R2 > 0.8) only when the genes are predominantly under negative selection. Because most genes in most taxa are strongly constrained by negative selection, ΔU has indeed appeared to be a nearly universal measure of codon evolution. In conclusion, molecular evolution at the codon level generally takes small steps due to the prevailing negative selection. Whether positive selection may, or may not, follow the small-step rule is addressed in a companion study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.