Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31504459›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2020

Barriers and opportunities for prolonging working life across different occupational groups: the SeniorWorkingLife study.

Lars L Andersen, Per H Jensen, Emil Sundstrup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Barriers and Facilitators of Re-Employment among Senior Workers: Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. New Technology and Loss of Paid Employment among Older Workers: Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lars L AndersenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per H JensenCentre for Comparative Welfare Studies, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Emil SundstrupNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing retirement age is a pivotal issue in labour market reforms. This study analyses factors conditioning retirement intentions.

methodsIn SeniorWorkingLife, 11 444 employed workers ≥50 years replied to questions in random order about expected reasons for leaving and potential reasons for staying longer at the labour market. Respondents were stratified based on the Danish version of International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO). Representative estimates were produced using the SurveyFreq and SurveyLogistic procedures of SAS combined with model-assisted weights based on national registers.

resultsFor ISCO groups 1-4 (seated work) main expected reasons for retiring were freedom to choose and desire for more leisure time, but many would consider staying longer if there were better possibilities for additional senior days, longer vacations and flexible working hours. For ISCO groups 5-9 (physical work), poor physical health and not being capable of doing the job were common expected reasons for retiring, but many would consider staying longer if the work were less physically demanding and there were more senior days. Possibility for pension was a general expected reason for retiring. Expected reasons differed to a less extent between genders than between ISCO groups, e.g. economic factors were more important for men and high work demands more important for women.

conclusionDifferent barriers and opportunities for prolonging working life exist across different occupational groups of the labour market-with most consistent differences between those with seated and physical work. Targeting these specifically seems opportune for policy makers and future interventions.

Indexed as

OccupationsRetirementFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPensionsPhysical Examination

Identifiers

PMID31504459
PMCPMC7183363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.