Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31504455›Full record

Observational studyFamily practice2020

Health care use and remaining needs for support among women with breast cancer in the first 15 months after diagnosis: the role of the GP.

Deborah N Lo-Fo-Wong, Hanneke C de Haes, Neil K Aaronson, Doris L van Abbema, Jolien M Admiraal, Mathilda D den Boer, Marjan van Hezewijk, Marcelle Immink, Ad A Kaptein, Marian B Menke-Pluijmers and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Deborah N Lo-Fo-WongErasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam.
Hanneke C de HaesAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam.
Neil K AaronsonThe Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam.
Doris L van AbbemaGROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht.
Jolien M AdmiraalUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen.
Mathilda D den BoerTreant Zorggroep, Scheper Hospital, Emmen.
Marjan van HezewijkRadiotherapy Group, Arnhem.
Marcelle ImminkReinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft.
Ad A KapteinLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
Marian B Menke-PluijmersAlbert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht.
Nicola S RussellThe Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam.
Manon SchriekSt. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg.
Sieta SijtsemaIsala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Geertjan van TienhovenAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam.
Mirjam A SprangersAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAlbert Schweitzer Hospital · GAErasmus MC · NLIsala · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NLRadiotherapie Groep · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLSt. Elisabeth Hospital · CWTreant Zorggroep · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of women with breast cancer in general practice is rising. To address their needs and wishes for a referral, GPs might benefit from more insight into women's health care practices and need for additional support.

objectiveTo examine the prevalence of health care use and remaining needs among women with breast cancer in the first 15 months after diagnosis.

methodsIn this multicentre, prospective, observational study women with breast cancer completed a questionnaire at 6 and 15 months post-diagnosis. Medical data were retrieved through chart reviews. The prevalence of types of health care used and remaining needs related to medical, psychosocial, paramedical and supplementary service care (such as home care), was examined with descriptive analyses.

resultsSeven hundred forty-six women completed both questionnaires. At both assessments patients reported that they had most frequent contact with medical and paramedical providers, independent of types of treatment received. Three to fifteen percent of the patients expressed a need for more support. Prominent needs included a wish for more frequent contact with a physiotherapist, a clinical geneticist and a psychologist. Patients also wanted more help for chores around the house, particularly in the early post-treatment phase.

conclusionA small but relevant percentage of women with breast cancer report having unmet needs. GPs may need to be particularly watchful of their need for more support from specific providers. Future research into the necessity of structural needs assessment among cancer patients in general practice is warranted.

Indexed as

General PractitionersHealth Services Needs and DemandPatient Acceptance of Health CarePhysician's RoleSocial SupportAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBreast neoplasmscancer survivorsdelivery of health careneeds assessmentprimary health carereferral and consultation

Identifiers

PMID31504455
PMCPMC7031058
OpenAlexW2971054822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.