Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31504327›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2020

Eliminating Structural Barriers: The Impact of Unrestricted Access on Hepatitis C Treatment Uptake Among People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

Sahar Saeed, Erin Strumpf, Erica E M Moodie, Leo Wong, Joseph Cox, Sharon Walmsley, Mark Tyndall, Curtis Cooper, Brian Conway, Mark Hull and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Regional differences in access to direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C across Ontario: A cross-sectional study.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The hepatitis C epidemic in Canada: An overview of recent trends in surveillance, injection drug use, harm reduction and treatment.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Sahar SaeedDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Erin StrumpfDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Erica E M MoodieDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Leo WongResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Joseph CoxDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Sharon WalmsleyUniversity Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mark TyndallBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Curtis CooperCanadian Institute for Health Research, Canadian Human Immunodeficiency Virus Trials Network,, Vancouver, Canada.
Brian ConwayVancouver Infectious Diseases Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
Mark HullCanadian Institute for Health Research, Canadian Human Immunodeficiency Virus Trials Network,, Vancouver, Canada.
Valerie Martel-LaferriereDepartement de Microbiologie et Infectiologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
John GillSouthern Alberta Human Immunodeficiency Virus Clinic, Calgary, Canada.
Alexander WongRegina Qu'Appelle Health Region, Regina, Canada.
Marie-Louise VachonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Laval University, Québec City, Canada.
Marina B KleinResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Canadian Coinfection Cohort Study Investigators
McGill University Health Centre · CAMcGill University · CAOttawa Hospital · CASt. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAAlberta Hip and Knee Clinic · CARegina Qu'Appelle Health Region · CAVancouver Infectious Diseases Centre · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

CIHR CTN222CIHR FDN-143270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh costs of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have led health-care insurers to limit access worldwide. Using a natural experiment, we evaluated the impact of removing fibrosis stage restrictions on hepatitis C (HCV) treatment initiation rates among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and then examined who was left to be treated.

methodsUsing data from the Canadian HIV-HCV Coinfection Cohort, we applied a difference-in-differences approach. Changes in treatment initiation rates following the removal of fibrosis stage restrictions were assessed using a negative binomial regression with generalized estimating equations. The policy change was then specifically assessed among people who inject drugs (PWID). We then identified the characteristics of participants who remained to be treated using a modified Poisson regression.

resultsBetween 2010-2018, there were a total of 585 HCV initiations among 1130 eligible participants. After removing fibrosis stage restrictions, DAA initiations increased by 1.8-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.4) controlling for time-invariant differences and secular trends. Among PWID the impact appeared even stronger, with an adjusted incidence rate ratio of 3.6 (95% CI 1.8-7.4). However, this increased treatment uptake was not sustained. At 1 year following universal access, treatment rates declined to 0.8 (95% CI .5-1.1). Marginalized participants (PWID and those of indigenous ethnicity) and those disengaged from care were more likely to remain HCV RNA positive.

conclusionsAfter the removal of fibrosis restrictions, HCV treatment initiations nearly doubled immediately, but this treatment rate was not sustained. To meet the World Health Organization elimination targets, the minimization of structural barriers and adoption of tailored interventions are needed to engage and treat all vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Hepatitis CHepatitis C, ChronicHIV InfectionsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAntiviral AgentsCanadaHIVHumansAntiviral Agentsdirect-acting antiviralsHIV–hepatitis C coinfectionpeople who inject drugsquasi-experimental methodsunrestricted access

Identifiers

PMID31504327
PMCPMC7353326
OpenAlexW2970704508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.