Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31504293›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2020

Neurosyphilis Treatment Outcomes After Intravenous Penicillin G Versus Intramuscular Procaine Penicillin Plus Oral Probenecid.

Shelia B Dunaway, Clare L Maxwell, Lauren C Tantalo, Sharon K Sahi, Christina M Marra

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Rapidly progressive dementia by late neurosyphilis (general paresis). Case report].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Otosyphilis: A Review of the Literature.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shelia B DunawayDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Clare L MaxwellDepartment of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Lauren C TantaloDepartment of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sharon K SahiDepartment of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Christina M MarraDepartment of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

PERSISTENCE OF CNS T PALLIDUM IN HIV INFECTIONR01NS034235 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARRA, CHRISTINA M · 1996 to 2018
$7.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS034235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData comparing neurosyphilis treatment regimens are limited.

methodsParticipants were enrolled in a study of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) abnormalities in syphilis that was conducted at the University of Washington between April 2003 to May 2014. They were diagnosed with syphilis and referred by their providers due to concerns for neurosyphilis. We evaluated 150 people with CSF abnormalities who were treated with either intravenous aqueous penicillin G (PenG) or intramuscular aqueous procaine penicillin G plus oral probenecid (APPG-P). An abnormal CSF diagnosis was defined as a white blood cell (WBC) count >20/µL, a CSF protein reading >50 mg/dL, or a reactive CSF-Venereal Disease Research Laboratory test (VDRL). Hazard ratios for normalization of CSF or serum measures were determined using Cox regression.

resultsIn individuals treated with either PenG or APPG-P, CSF WBCs and CSF-VDRL reactivity normalized within 12 months after treatment, while protein normalized more slowly and less completely. There was no relationship between treatment regimen or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status and likelihood of normalization of any measure. Among those living with HIV, CSF WBC counts and CSF-VDRL reactivity were more likely to normalize in those treated with antiretrovirals. Unexpectedly, CSF WBCs were more likely to normalize in those with low CD4+ T cell counts. When neurosyphilis was more stringently defined as a reactive CSF-VDRL, the relationship with the CD4+ T cell count remained unchanged.

conclusionsIn the current antiretroviral treatment era, neurosyphilis treatment outcomes are not different for PenG and APPG-P, regardless of HIV status. The relationship between the normalization of CSF WBC counts and CD4+ T cell counts may indicate continued imprecision in neurosyphilis diagnostic criteria, due to HIV-related CSF pleocytosis.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsNeurosyphilisHumansPenicillin GPenicillin G ProcaineProbenecidTreatment OutcomePenicillin GPenicillin G ProcaineProbenecidHIVneurosyphilispenicillin Gprocaine penicillinsyphilis

Identifiers

PMID31504293
PMCPMC7353337
OpenAlexW2969445686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.