Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31504277›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020

Topography Impacts Topology: Anatomically Central Areas Exhibit a "High-Level Connector" Profile in the Human Cortex.

Jiahe Zhang, Lianne H Scholtens, Yongbin Wei, Martijn P van den Heuvel, Lorena Chanes, Lisa Feldman Barrett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Categorization is 'baked' into the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Brain connectome from neuronal morphology.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The neurobiology of interoception and affect.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Common Microscale and Macroscale Principles of Connectivity in the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiahe ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Lianne H ScholtensConnectome Lab, Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yongbin WeiConnectome Lab, Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn P van den HeuvelConnectome Lab, Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lorena ChanesDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology-Serra Húnter Programme, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Lisa Feldman BarrettDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

Affect regulation and Beta Amyloid: Maturational Factors in Aging and Age-Related PathologyR01MH113234 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI DICKERSON, BRADFORD C, ISAACOWITZ, DEREK M · 2017 to 2021
$4.2M
Ovarian Effects on Intrinsic Connectivity and the Affective Enhancement of MemoryR01MH109464 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ANDREANO, JOSEPH M, BARRETT, LISA FELDMAN · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
Fundamental subcortical mechanisms of affective processingU01CA193632 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BARRETT, LISA FELDMAN, SATPUTE, AJAY · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
EPA EP-C-16-015NCI NIH HHS U01 CA193632NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109464NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degree centrality is a widely used measure in complex networks. Within the brain, degree relates to other topological features, with high-degree nodes (i.e., hubs) exhibiting high betweenness centrality, participation coefficient, and within-module z-score. However, increasing evidence from neuroanatomical and predictive processing literature suggests that topological properties of a brain network may also be impacted by topography, that is, anatomical (spatial) distribution. More specifically, cortical limbic areas (agranular and dysgranular cortices), which occupy an anatomically central position, have been proposed to be topologically central and well suited to initiate predictions in the cerebral cortex. We estimated anatomical centrality and showed that it positively correlated with betweenness centrality, participation coefficient, and communicability, analogously to degree. In contrast to degree, however, anatomical centrality negatively correlated with within-module z-score. Our data suggest that degree centrality and anatomical centrality reflect distinct contributions to cortical organization. Whereas degree would be more related to the amount of information integration performed by an area, anatomical centrality would be more related to an area's position in the predictive hierarchy. Highly anatomically central areas may function as "high-level connectors," integrating already highly integrated information across modules. These results are consistent with a high-level, domain-general limbic workspace, integrated by highly anatomically central cortical areas.

Indexed as

AdultCerebral CortexConnectomeFemaleHumansLimbic SystemMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysYoung Adultconnectomecortical typedegree centralitylimbic corticespredictive processing

Identifiers

PMID31504277
PMCPMC7132940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.