Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31504150›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2020

Protein functional annotation of simultaneously improved stability, accuracy and false discovery rate achieved by a sequence-based deep learning.

Jiajun Hong, Yongchao Luo, Yang Zhang, Junbiao Ying, Weiwei Xue, Tian Xie, Lin Tao, Feng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An informatic workflow for the enhanced annotation of excretory/secretory proteins ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiajun HongKey Laboratory of Elemene Class Anti-cancer Chinese Medicine of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Yongchao LuoCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yang ZhangCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Junbiao YingCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Weiwei XueSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Tian XieKey Laboratory of Elemene Class Anti-cancer Chinese Medicine of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Lin TaoKey Laboratory of Elemene Class Anti-cancer Chinese Medicine of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Feng ZhuKey Laboratory of Elemene Class Anti-cancer Chinese Medicine of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional annotation of protein sequence with high accuracy has become one of the most important issues in modern biomedical studies, and computational approaches of significantly accelerated analysis process and enhanced accuracy are greatly desired. Although a variety of methods have been developed to elevate protein annotation accuracy, their ability in controlling false annotation rates remains either limited or not systematically evaluated. In this study, a protein encoding strategy, together with a deep learning algorithm, was proposed to control the false discovery rate in protein function annotation, and its performances were systematically compared with that of the traditional similarity-based and de novo approaches. Based on a comprehensive assessment from multiple perspectives, the proposed strategy and algorithm were found to perform better in both prediction stability and annotation accuracy compared with other de novo methods. Moreover, an in-depth assessment revealed that it possessed an improved capacity of controlling the false discovery rate compared with traditional methods. All in all, this study not only provided a comprehensive analysis on the performances of the newly proposed strategy but also provided a tool for the researcher in the fields of protein function annotation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerProteinsProteinsannotation accuracydeep learningfalse discovery rateprediction stabilityprotein function prediction

Identifiers

PMID31504150
PMCPMC7412958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.