Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31504059›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Transcriptome analysis of a nematode resistant and susceptible upland cotton line at two critical stages of Meloidogyne incognita infection and development.

Pawan Kumar, Sameer Khanal, Mychele Da Silva, Rippy Singh, Richard F Davis, Robert L Nichols, Peng W Chee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Combating Root-Knot Nematodes (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. RNA-Seq of Cyst Nematode Infestation of Potato (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Root-Knot Nematode Resistance inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pawan KumarDept. of Crop and Soil Sciences and Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, United States of America.
Sameer KhanalDept. of Crop and Soil Sciences and Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3342-0381
Mychele Da SilvaDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, United States of America.
Rippy SinghDept. of Crop and Soil Sciences and Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, United States of America.
Richard F DavisDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, United States of America.
Robert L NicholsCotton Incorporated, Cary, NC, United States of America.
Peng W CheeDept. of Crop and Soil Sciences and Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3915-9604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host plant resistance is the most practical approach to control the Southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita; RKN), which has emerged as one of the most serious economic pests of Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Previous QTL analyses have identified a resistance locus on chromosome 11 (qMi-C11) affecting galling and another locus on chromosome-14 (qMi-C14) affecting egg production. Although these two QTL regions were fine mapped and candidate genes identified, expression profiling of genes would assist in further narrowing the list of candidate genes in the QTL regions. We applied the comparative transcriptomic approach to compare expression profiles of genes between RKN susceptible and resistance genotypes at an early stage of RKN development that coincides with the establishment of a feeding site and at the late stage of RKN development that coincides with RKN egg production. Sequencing of cDNA libraries produced over 315 million reads of which 240 million reads (76%) were mapped on to the Gossypium hirsutum genome. A total of 3,789 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified which were further grouped into four clusters based on their expression profiles. A large number of DEGs were found to be down regulated in the susceptible genotype at the late stage of RKN development whereas several genes were up regulated in the resistant genotype. Key enriched categories included transcription factor activity, defense response, response to phyto-hormones, cell wall organization, and protein serine/threonine kinase activity. Our results also show that the DEGs in the resistant genotype at qMi-C11 and qMi-C14 loci displayed higher expression of defense response, detoxification and callose deposition genes, than the DEGs in the susceptible genotype.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceTranscriptomeAnimalsChromosomes, PlantGossypiumHost-Parasite InteractionsQuantitative Trait LociTylenchoidea

Identifiers

PMID31504059
PMCPMC6736245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.