ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020
Background suppressed magnetization transfer MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of advanced magnetic resonance imaging in glaucoma: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUp to 30% of the hydrogen atoms in brain tissue are part of molecules ("semisolids") other than water. In MRI, their magnetization is typically not observed directly, but can influence the water magnetization through magnetization transfer (MT). Comparison of MRI scans differentially sensitized to MT allows estimation of the semisolid fraction and potential changes with disease. Here, we present an approach designed to improve this estimate by measuring the size of the MT effect in a single scan.
methodsA stimulated echo sequence was used to generate a spatial pattern in the longitudinal water magnetization, which was then given time to exchange with semisolids. After saturating the remaining water magnetization, reverse exchange was allowed to partly re-establish the original water magnetization pattern. The third excitation pulse then formed a stimulated echo out of this pattern.
resultsMT data were obtained on 10 human subjects at 7 T with varying exchange times. The images showed the expected time dependence of signal associated with the forward and reverse exchange processes. Excellent suppression of non-exchanging background signal was achieved. As expected, this suppression came at the price of a substantial reduction in exchange-related signal (by ~75% compared to the signal in saturation recovery MT), in part because of the reliance on a 2-step exchange process.
conclusionThe results demonstrate an MT signal can be observed in a single acquisition without subtraction. This may be advantageous for MT measurements when signal instabilities related to motion and physiological variations exceed thermal noise sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.