Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31502587›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Effect of Total Ankle Arthroplasty and Ankle Arthrodesis for Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Study.

Jakub Wąsik, Tomasz Stołtny, Jarosław Pasek, Karol Szyluk, Michał Pyda, Alina Ostałowska, Sławomir Kasperczyk, Bogdan Koczy

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jakub WąsikI Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, District Hospital of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Piekary Śląskie, Poland.
Tomasz StołtnyI Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, District Hospital of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Piekary Śląskie, Poland.
Jarosław PasekInstitute of Physical Education, Tourism and Physiotherapy, University of Jan Długosz in Częstochowa, Częstochowa, Poland.
Karol SzylukVI Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, District Hospital of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Piekary Śląskie, Poland.
Michał PydaVIII Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, District Hospital of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Piekary Śląskie, Poland.
Alina OstałowskaDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Zabrze, Poland.
Sławomir KasperczykDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Zabrze, Poland.
Bogdan KoczyI Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, District Hospital of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Piekary Śląskie, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Surgical methods in treatment of joint osteoarthritis (OA) aim at meeting the increasing expectations of people with active lifestyles. Ankle joint arthroplasty has been performed increasingly more often as an alternative to arthrodesis. The aim of this study was to compare arthrodesis and arthroplasty in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study involved 56 patients (45 males and 11 females) aged 21-72 years (mean 51) presenting with end-stage ankle OA: 29 patients (52%) underwent arthroplasty (Group A) and 27 patients (48%) underwent arthrodesis (Group B). Patients underwent surgery between 2004 and 2016 at a single clinical center. The observation period ranged from 6 to 150 months (mean 55 months). To assess the results of surgical treatment, quality of life (Health Assessment Questionnaire-HAQ, 12-Item Short-Form Survey-SF-12) and functional (American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle-AOFAS, Kofoed, Takakura) scores were used. For pain assessment, Visual Analog Scale was used (VAS). RESULTS After the surgery, group A and B had a statistically significant improvement in the joint function and pain relief according to AOFAS (A: 32.6 to 68.2; B: 27.4 to 61.3), Kofoed (A: 31.8 to 68; B: 25.9 to 60.3), Takakura (A: 30.6 to 62.9; B: 25.4 to 49.3), and VAS scores (A: 7.28 to 4.14; B: 7.33 to 3.78) compared with preoperative scores. After the surgery, quality of life scores improved in both groups, for HAQ (A: 0.91 to 0.53; B: 1.34 to 0.56) and for SF-12 (A: 26.6 to 36.8; B: 25.6 to 38.0). CONCLUSIONS The comparison of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis in treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis did not reveal any significant differences.

Indexed as

ArthrodesisArthroplasty, Replacement, AnkleAdultAgedAnkleFemaleFootHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeVisual Analog ScaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31502587
PMCPMC6752092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.