ArticleJournal of biosciences2019
Life cycle assessment of
Article in Journal of biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioprospecting Microalgae from Sewage Water: Assessment of Biochemicals for Biomass Utilization.Molecular biotechnology · 2023Article
- Biotechnological Approaches for Biomass and Lipid Production Using MicroalgaeJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Interaction between CO2-consuming autotrophy and CO2-producing heterotrophy in non-axenic phototrophic biofilms.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Constantly rising energy demands, finite fossil fuel reserves and deteriorating environmental conditions have invoked worldwide interest to explore the sustainable sources of renewable biofuels. Locally adapted photosynthetic oleaginous microalgae with rapid growth on variable temperatures could be an ideal way for bioremediating the wastewater (WW) while producing the feedstock for biodiesel. To test this notion, an unknown strain was isolated from a sewage fed lake (Neela-Hauz). It was discerned as Chlorella sorokiniana-I using the 16S rDNA and 18S rDNA barcodes. The culture conditions such as pH, illumination, different temperature ranges and growth medium were cohesively optimized prior to the assessment of C. sorokiniana-I's efficacy to remediate the WWand biodiesel production. The strain has thrived well up to 40°C when continuously grown for 15 days. The highest lipid accumulation and biomass productivity were recorded in 100% WW. Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) content was observed to be more than twice in WW (47%), compared to control synthetic media, TAP (20%) and BG11 (10%), which indicate the importance of this new isolate for producing economically viable biodiesel. Moreover, it is highly efficient in removing the total nitrogen (77%), total phosphorous (81%), iron (67%) and calcium (42%) from the WW. The quality of WW was considerably improved by reducing the overall chemical oxygen demand (48%), biological oxygen demand (47%) and alkalinity (15%). Thus, C. sorokiniana-I could be an ideal alga for the tropical countries in the remediation of WW while producing feedstock for biodiesel in a cost-effective manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31502567What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.