Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31502540›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

How prolonged expression of Hunchback, a temporal transcription factor, re-wires locomotor circuits.

Julia L Meng, Zarion D Marshall, Meike Lobb-Rabe, Ellie S Heckscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hacking brain development to test models of sensory coding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Integrated Patterning Programs DuringAnnual review of neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia L MengDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Program in Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Zarion D MarshallDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Program in Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Meike Lobb-RabeDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Program in Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Ellie S HeckscherDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Program in Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7618-0616

Funding

Molecular And Cellular Biology Training ProgramT32GM007183 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GLICK, BENJAMIN S, RICE, PHOEBE A · 1985 to 2021
$23.9M
Development of neuronal circuits for innate behaviorR01NS105748 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HECKSCHER, ELIZABETH (ELLIE) S · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
National Science Foundation DGE-1746045NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007183NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105748NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS105748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How circuits assemble starting from stem cells is a fundamental question in developmental neurobiology. We test the hypothesis that, in neuronal stem cells, temporal transcription factors predictably control neuronal terminal features and circuit assembly. Using the Drosophila motor system, we manipulate expression of the classic temporal transcription factor Hunchback (Hb) specifically in the NB7-1 stem cell, which produces U motor neurons (MNs), and then we monitor dendrite morphology and neuromuscular synaptic partnerships. We find that prolonged expression of Hb leads to transient specification of U MN identity, and that embryonic molecular markers do not accurately predict U MN terminal features. Nonetheless, our data show Hb acts as a potent regulator of neuromuscular wiring decisions. These data introduce important refinements to current models, show that molecular information acts early in neurogenesis as a switch to control motor circuit wiring, and provide novel insight into the relationship between stem cell and circuit.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsMotor NeuronsNeural PathwaysNeuromuscular JunctionStem CellsTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinshb protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factorsdevelopmental biologyD. melanogasterheterochronicmotor neuronsneuroblastneuromuscular junctionneurosciencetemporal identitytemporal patterning

Identifiers

PMID31502540
PMCPMC6754208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.