Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31502263›Full record

SynthesisClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2020

Meta-Analyses of Clinical Efficacy of Risankizumab and Adalimumab in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: Supporting Evidence of Risankizumab Superiority.

Han Witjes, Amit Khatri, Paul M Diderichsen, Jaap Mandema, Ahmed A Othman

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New Treatment Addressing the Pathogenesis of Psoriasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Han WitjesCertara b.v., Breda, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1596-6062
Amit KhatriClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6730-1260
Paul M DiderichsenCertara b.v., Breda, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3567-7903
Jaap MandemaCertara, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3182-8164
Ahmed A OthmanClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4937-2775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risankizumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, achieved significantly (P < 0.001) greater Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) clear or almost clear (0/1) responses than adalimumab in a phase III trial in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Meta-analyses of the PASI 50, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100, and sPGA0/1 responses after 16 weeks of treatment from eight (three for risankizumab and five for adalimumab) randomized, placebo-controlled trials were conducted to estimate the efficacy difference between risankizumab and adalimumab. For PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100, and sPGA0/1 responses, the estimated effect differences (95% confidence interval) between risankizumab and adalimumab were 15.2% (10.1%, 20.4%), 23.7% (15.7%, 31.2%), 20.8% (13.0%, 28.7%), and 20.1% (13.7%, 26.1%), respectively. These results were consistent with the observed efficacy difference from the head-to-head phase III trial, which was not included in the meta-analyses, providing independent, confirmatory evidence of the superior efficacy of risankizumab compared with adalimumab for treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalInterleukin-23PsoriasisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalInterleukin-23risankizumab

Identifiers

PMID31502263
PMCPMC7006886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.