Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31502065›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2019

Analysis and quantification of bone healing after open wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Elena Nemecek, Catharina Chiari, Alexander Valentinitsch, Franz Kainberger, Gerhard Hobusch, Alexander Kolb, Lena Hirtler, Carmen Trost, Slobodan Vukicevic, Reinhard Windhager

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recombinant Human BMP6 Applied Within Autologous Blood Coagulum Accelerates Bone Healing: Randomized Controlled Trial in High Tibial Osteotomy Patients.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena NemecekDepartment for Orthopedics and Trauma-Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Catharina ChiariDepartment for Orthopedics and Trauma-Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander ValentinitschDepartment for Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Franz KainbergerDepartment for Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard HobuschDepartment for Orthopedics and Trauma-Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander KolbDepartment for Orthopedics and Trauma-Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Lena HirtlerCenter for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Carmen TrostDepartment for Orthopedics and Trauma-Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Slobodan VukicevicCenter for Translational and Clinical Research, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Reinhard WindhagerDepartment for Orthopedics and Trauma-Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. reinhard.windhager@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to analyze radiographic imaging techniques and to quantify bone ossification in the osteotomy gap after high tibial osteotomy. MATERIAL AND

methodsStudy phase 1: high tibial osteotomy was performed on six lower extremities of human body donors and experimental X‑rays and computed tomography (CT) scans were applied. Different techniques were evaluated by three specialists for best representation of the osteotomy gap. Study phase 2: optimized radiological techniques were used for follow-up on 12 patients. The radiographs were examined by 3 specialists measuring 10 different parameters. The CT scans were analyzed with semiautomatic computer software for quantification of bone ossification.

resultsThe osteotomy gap was best represented in 30° of flexion in the knee and 20° internal rotation of the leg. There were significant changes of the medial width over time (p < 0.019) as well as of the length of fused osteotomy, the Schröter score, sclerosis, trabecular structure and zone area measurements. Sclerosis, medial width of the osteotomy and area measurements were detected as reproducible parameters. Bone mineral density was calculated using CT scans, showing a significantly higher value 12 weeks postoperatively (112.5 mg/cm

conclusionSclerosis and medial width of the osteotomy gap as well as area measurements were determined as reproducible parameters for evaluation of bone healing. Quantification of bone ossification can be calculated with CT scans using a semiautomatic computer program and should be used for research in bone healing.

Indexed as

Fracture HealingTibiaFractures, BoneHumansKnee JointOsteotomyAnalysis of osteotomy gapBone healingBone ossificationCT scan analysisRadiographic analysis

Identifiers

PMID31502065
PMCPMC6908562
OpenAlexW2972878454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.