Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31502064›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2020

Cervicofacial and Pharyngolaryngeal Lymphedema and Deglutition After Head and Neck Cancer Treatment.

Débora Dos Santos Queija, Rogério Aparecido Dedivitis, Lica Arakawa-Sugueno, Mario Augusto Ferrari de Castro, Bruna Mello Chamma, Marco Aurélio Vamondes Kulcsar, Leandro Luongo de Matos

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Débora Dos Santos QueijaSão Paulo Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. dqueija@uol.com.br.
Rogério Aparecido DedivitisDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, São Paulo Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Lica Arakawa-SuguenoSão Paulo Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Mario Augusto Ferrari de CastroMedical School, University Metropolitana of Santos, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Bruna Mello ChammaMogi das Cruzes University, Mogi das Cruzes, SP, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio Vamondes KulcsarDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, São Paulo Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Leandro Luongo de MatosDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, São Paulo Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de Mogi das Cruzes · BRUniversidade Metropolitana de Santos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the sequelae of head and neck cancer treatment is secondary lymphedema, with important impact on breathing, swallowing and vocal functions. The aim of the study was to assess the presence, staging characteristics and relationship of external and internal lymphedema and dysphagia after head and neck cancer treatment. The MDACC Lymphedema Rating Scale in Head and Neck Cancer was employed for the assessment and staging of face and neck lymphedema; the Radiotherapy Edema Scale for internal lymphedema; and a fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) for swallowing. The sample consisted of 46 patients with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Lymphedema was detected in 97.8% (45) of the evaluations with predominance of the composite type (73.9%-34). A high percentage of external lymphedema of the neck (71.7%-33) and submandibular (63%-29) were detected, with predominance of the more advanced levels. Internal edema was found in almost all structures and spaces at moderate/severe level. At FEES, residue (higher percentage in valleculae and pyriform sinus), penetration and aspirations were observed. The residue was detected in higher occurrence in patients with composite lymphedema (p = 0.012). The combined treatment with radiotherapy was related to submandibular external lymphedema (p = 0.009), altered pharyngolaryngeal sensitivity (0.040), presence of residue (p = 0.001) and penetration to pasty (p = 0.007) and internal edema in almost all structures. There was also a higher percentage of residue in cases with internal altered pharyngolaryngeal sensitivity, residue, penetration and aspiration. Combined treatment with radiotherapy is an associated factor of edema. Cervicofacial and pharyngolaryngeal lymphedema is a frequent event after treatment for HNC, with important impact on swallowing performance characterised by altered pharyngolaryngeal sensitivity, residue, penetration and aspiration. Combined treatment with radiotherapy is an associated factor.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic ProtocolsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCombined Modality TherapyDeglutition DisordersFaceFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLarynxLymphedemaMaleMiddle AgedNeckAntineoplastic AgentsDeglutitionDeglutition disordersHead and neck neoplasmsLymphedemaNeck dissectionRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31502064
OpenAlexW2972319296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.