Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31502028›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2020

Decision-making in temporal lobe epilepsy surgery based on invasive stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG).

Lasse Dührsen, Thomas Sauvigny, Franz L Ricklefs, Wolfgang Hamel, Johannes A Koeppen, Jonas M Hebel, Michael Lanz, Tobias Martens

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lasse DührsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. l.duehrsen@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2635-8583
Thomas SauvignyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Franz L RicklefsDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Wolfgang HamelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Johannes A KoeppenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jonas M HebelHamburg Epilepsy Center, Protestant Hospital Alsterdorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael LanzHamburg Epilepsy Center, Protestant Hospital Alsterdorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias MartensDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Alsterdorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medical refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), the epileptogenic zone can be difficult to identify and therefore difficult to treat, especially in the absence of clear MRI pathologies and specific results from presurgical evaluation. Invasive monitoring with stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) is a tool for a better determination of the epileptogenic zone. Here, we investigate the impact of sEEG on decision-making in temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. We reviewed patients with TLE who underwent further investigation with sEEG in our epilepsy unit. We examined specifically how sEEG findings influenced our decision regarding indication for a surgical procedure and resection volume. From 2013 to 2017, we performed 152 temporal resections in epilepsy patients. Twenty-one of these patients were designated for further preoperative investigation with sEEG due to incongruent findings in presurgical evaluation. Six patients were implanted bitemporally. In five cases, the hypothesis for the epileptogenic zone and localization had to be changed due to sEEG findings and resulted in a different tailored resection than intended. In three cases, sEEG findings led to the cancelation of the originally intended temporal resection as the epileptogenic zone was not definable or bilateral. In another three cases, the prognosis for reduction of seizures postoperatively had to be reduced due to the sEEG findings. However, the resection was performed after interdisciplinary discussion and informed consent of the patient. The examination by sEEG led to a change of plan for further treatment in 13 patients (61.9%) suffering TLE in total. Invasive monitoring with sEEG electrodes had a strong impact on decision-making for further treatment in patients suffering from temporal lobe epilepsy with incongruent findings in presurgical examination designated for epilepsy surgery. This applies to resection volumes as well as to prediction of seizure outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultClinical Decision-MakingElectrodes, ImplantedElectroencephalographyEpilepsy, Temporal LobeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeNeurosurgical ProceduresPrognosisSeizuresTreatment OutcomeBilateralEpilepsy surgeryStereo-encephalography (sEEG)Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE)

Identifiers

PMID31502028
OpenAlexW2972902050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.