Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501990›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2020

Help or hindrance: how do microtubule-based forces contribute to genome damage and repair?

Cassi Estrem, Jeffrey K Moore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cassi EstremDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jeffrey K MooreDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. jeffrey.moore@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3262-3248

Funding

Regulation of Microtubule Function by Tubulin Carboxy-terminal TailsR01GM112893 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MOORE, JEFFREY KYLE · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM112893NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forces generated by molecular motors and the cytoskeleton move the nucleus and genome during many cellular processes, including cell migration and division. How these forces impact the genome, and whether cells regulate cytoskeletal forces to preserve genome integrity is unclear. We recently demonstrated that, in budding yeast, mutants that stabilize the microtubule cytoskeleton cause excessive movement of the mitotic spindle and nucleus. We found that increased nuclear movement results in DNA damage and increased time to repair the damage through homology-directed repair. Our results indicate that nuclear movement impairs DNA repair through increased tension on chromosomes and nuclear deformation. However, the previous studies have shown genome mobility, driven by cytoskeleton-based forces, aids in homology-directed DNA repair. This sets up an apparent paradox, where genome mobility may prevent or promote DNA repair. Hence, this review explores how the genome is affected by nuclear movement and how genome mobility could aid or hinder homology-directed repair.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsMicrotubulesSaccharomycetalesCytoskeletonDNA damageDyneinHDRMicrotubuleNucleus

Identifiers

PMID31501990
PMCPMC7061087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.