Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501985›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2019

[Role of pressure and temperature in ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy : Pressure and temperature changes during stone treatment].

F Strittmatter, M J Bader

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

F StrittmatterUrologische Klinik und Poliklinik, LMU München, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. frank.strittmatter@med.uni-muenchen.de.
M J BaderUroClinic München an der Oper, Residenzstraße 18, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy are minimally invasive procedures and are the standard procedures for the treatment of kidney stones and ureteral calculi. To achieve an adequate view, in both methods an optimal and sufficient irrigation flow is necessary. The intrarenal pressure is influenced by the irrigation pressure and irrigation volume and has to be controlled. Pathologically elevated intrarenal pressure can lead to irreversible damage of the kidneys. Lasers are frequently used for stone fragmentation. It has been shown in studies that the laser energy can lead to an increase in the temperature and that thermal effects can also damage the kidneys. This article provides the surgeon with an overview about the effects of temperature and pressure changes during ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy and how damages can be avoided.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureHumansKidney CalculiMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNephrostomy, PercutaneousPressureTreatment OutcomeUreteral CalculiUreteroscopyInfectionsIntrarenal pressureKidney damageReflux, pyelorenalStone treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.