ArticleOecologia2019
Free-living parasite infectious stages promote zooplankton abundance under the risk of predation.
Article in Oecologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consumption of trematode parasite infectious stages: from conceptual synthesis to future research agenda.Journal of helminthology · 2023Review
- Can predators stabilize host-parasite interactions? Changes in aquatic predator identity alter amphibian responses and parasite abundance across life stages.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- How predator and parasite size interact to determine consumption of infectious stages.Oecologia · 2021Article
- The contributions of a trematode parasite infectious stage to carbon cycling in a model freshwater system.Parasitology research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Free-living parasite infectious stages, such as the cercariae of trematodes (flatworms), can represent substantial biomass in aquatic ecosystems, yet their interactions with other planktonic fauna are poorly understood. Given that cercariae are consumed by various aquatic predators, sometimes even preferentially over zooplankton, their presence may decrease predation pressure on free-living organisms within similar trophic niches by serving as alternate prey. Here, we experimentally examined how the presence of cercariae (Plagiorchis sp.) affected the population dynamics of common freshwater zooplankton (Daphnia sp.) in the presence of a predator (the larval dragonfly, Leucorrhinia intacta) known to consume both. After seeding 48 mesocosms with starting populations of Daphnia, we used four treatments (12 replicates each) representing a factorial combination of the absence/presence of both cercariae and dragonfly larvae and tracked Daphnia populations over 4 weeks. We found a significant interaction between the presence of cercariae and predators on Daphnia population size. When faced with predation pressure, Daphnia reached ~ 50% higher numbers when accompanied by cercariae than without, suggesting a "protective" effect of the latter by acting as substitute prey. Within aquatic ecosystems, an abundance of trematodes may prove advantageous for zooplankton communities that share common predators, but further studies will be needed to determine how this varies depending on the predator, trematode, and zooplankton taxa involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31501977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.