ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2020
Update on MR Imaging of cystic retroperitoneal masses.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiparametric MRI Assessment of Cervical Lymphadenopathy: Combined Diagnostic Performance of Morphological Features and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A gaint mesenteric cystic lymphangioma of small intestinal in an adult: A case report and literature review.Medicine · 2025Review
- Retroperitoneal cystic lymphangioma coexisting with a uterine fibroid in a 42-year-old woman: A case report.Case reports in women's health · 2024Article
- A Rare Case of Subclavicular Cystic Lymphangioma in Adults Adhering to Axillary Vessels.Cureus · 2023Article
- Imaging Findings and Misdiagnosis of Bronchogenic Cysts: A Study of 83 Cases.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2023Article
- Retroperitoneal lymphangioma mimicking malignant tumor treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis article reviews the MRI appearance of cystic retroperitoneal (RP) masses.
conclusionLymphangiomas are the most common RP cystic masses and typically appear simple; microscopic fat is a specific but insensitive finding. Location, internal complexity, and enhancement pattern suggest alternative diagnoses which range from normal anatomic variants to congenital abnormalities and importantly include benign, neurogenic, and malignant neoplasms. An approach to the MR imaging of cystic RP masses is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31501965What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.