Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501961›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2020

Impact on child and parent anxiety level of a teddy bear-scale mock magnetic resonance scanner.

Baptiste Morel, Frederic Andersson, Muriel Samalbide, Gauthier Binninger, Elodie Carpentier, Dominique Sirinelli, Jean-Philippe Cottier

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07420101 (A Mindfulness Approach to Scanxiety), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07420101 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Mindfulness Approach to Scanxiety

TypeinterventionalSponsorKimberley RocheRan2026 to 2027Enrolled160ConditionsCaregiver Anxiety, Caregiver Anxiety Related to Cancer Imaging, Pediatric OncologyArmsMindful Module Caregiver Packet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Baptiste MorelPediatric Radiology Department, Clocheville University Hospital, 49 Boulevard Beranger, 37000, Tours, France. baptiste.morel@univ-tours.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-4747-3393
Frederic AnderssonUMR 1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, Tours, France.
Muriel SamalbidePediatric Radiology Department, Clocheville University Hospital, 49 Boulevard Beranger, 37000, Tours, France.
Gauthier BinningerPediatric Radiology Department, Clocheville University Hospital, 49 Boulevard Beranger, 37000, Tours, France.
Elodie CarpentierPediatric Radiology Department, Clocheville University Hospital, 49 Boulevard Beranger, 37000, Tours, France.
Dominique SirinelliPediatric Radiology Department, Clocheville University Hospital, 49 Boulevard Beranger, 37000, Tours, France.
Jean-Philippe CottierFaculty of Medicine, Francois Rabelais University, Tours, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be stressful. Mock MR scanners have been proven to be effective in avoiding the use of general anesthesia.

objectivesWe prospectively evaluated the impact of a teddy bear-scale model of a mock MR scanner on the anxiety experienced by parents and their children during MRI without general anesthesia . MATERIALS AND

methodsA 1-year prospective study before and after the installation of a mock scanner in a Pediatric Radiology Department of a university hospital. Anxiety levels were self-estimated by children ages 4 to 16 years and by the parents with a visual analogue scale (from 0, completely relaxed, to 100, extremely stressed) at three moments: in the waiting room, in the preparation room after an explanation by the MRI technologists, and at the issue of the MR acquisition images. Two groups were tested: one with a mock MR scanner, the other without. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher exact tests were performed. Motion artifacts were studied.

resultsNinety-one children and their parents were included. The median age was 8 years (standard deviation [SD]=2). In the post mock period, the ambiance of the preparation room was considered by children as significantly more relaxing in 50% vs. 20% (P=0.004) and the anxiety level of children was significantly lower after the explanation, particularly in girls, but unchanged for their parents. The anxiety levels at the end of the examination were significantly lower for parents. The motion artifacts rate was lower (1.7% vs. 4.7%, P=0.04).

conclusionA mock scanner was an efficient tool to improve efficiency of the explanation and to decrease anxiety in children and motion artifacts in pediatric MRI.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnxietyChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParentsProspective StudiesAnxietyChildrenMagnetic resonance imagingMock scannerMotion artifacts

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.