ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2019
[Results of N1 and N2 surgery in non-small cell lung cancer].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic impact of multiple N2 stations in patients with non small cell lung cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- RETRACTED: Effects of thoracoscopic lobectomy on surgical wound infection in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Clinical therapeutic effects and prognosis of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery-guided pulmonary lobectomy combined with mediastinal lymph node dissection in lung carcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Somatic mutations combined with clinical features can predict the postoperative prognosis of stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymph node involvement in non-small cell lung cancer shows considerable heterogeneity within the N1 and N2 descriptors with respect to localization, the number of lymph nodes affected and the extent of mass and volume. In an attempt to reflect the different prognostic behavior of lymph node metastases, the 8th classification of the TNM has been published with proposals for further subtyping of the N1 and N2 stages into N1a, N1b, as well as N2a1, N2a2, and N2b. The aim of this article is to discuss the value of surgery of non-small cell lung cancer in the N1 and N2 lymph node metastatic stages. While overall survival benefits were seen after concomitant chemotherapy for patients with N1 metastatic disease and surgery, radiotherapy concepts did not provide any survival benefit in this subgroup. For patients with N2 metastasis, surgical resection is part of a multimodal treatment concept with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Careful restaging after neoadjuvant therapy is recommended in order to provide surgical treatment to patients deemed suitable for curative (R0) resection. In particular, it should be noted that after inductive chemoradiotherapy, patients should only be treated by pneumonectomy in specialized centers, as resection can be associated with a high risk of postoperative complications. With respect to the new subtyping of the N2 involvement situation in N2a1, N2a2, and N2b, further adapted multimodal treatment concepts are expected in the future. Initial results are reported for stage IIIA patients and the use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), robotic assisted thoracic surgery (RAST) and thoracotomy for local resection. These indicate that the use of minimally invasive techniques can achieve comparable results to open thoracotomy procedures, at least in specialized treatment centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.