Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501887›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2019

Afatinib versus methotrexate as second-line treatment in Asian patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing on or after platinum-based therapy (LUX-Head & Neck 3): an open-label, randomised phase III trial.

Y Guo, M-J Ahn, A Chan, C-H Wang, J-H Kang, S-B Kim, M Bello, R S Arora, Q Zhang, X He and 10 more

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01856478 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised, Open-label, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Afatinib (BIBW 2992) Versus Intravenous Methotrexate in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Have Progressed After Platinum-based Therapy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2013 to 2024Enrolled340ConditionsHead and Neck NeoplasmsArmsMethotrexate, Afatinib
NCT05517330 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Neoadjuvant Tislelizumab With Afatinib for the Treatment of Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm Phase 2 Trial (neoCHANCE-1 Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWest China HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled23ConditionsHead and Neck CancerArmsTislelizumab, Afatinib
NCT06494189 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Single-arm Clinical Study of Low-dose Radiotherapy Plus Tislelizumab in Combination With Afatinib for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Surgically Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorWest China HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled9ConditionsHead and Neck CancerArmsTislelizumab, Afatinib, Low dose radiotherapy
NCT06741982 phase1recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Single-arm Clinical Study of Immune-targeted Therapy Combined With Lysogenic HSV Virus for the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Surgically Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorWest China HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled21ConditionsHNSCC, Lysogenic HSV Virus, Neoadjuvant Therapy, ImmunotherapyArmsLysogenic HSV virus., Tislelizumab, Afatinib
NCT06759857 phase3enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Open, Positives Parallel-controlled, Multicenter Phase III to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FHND9041 Versus Afatinib in First-line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorJiangsu Chia Tai Fenghai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Ran2021 to 2025Enrolled350ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung CancerArmsFHND9041, Afatinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Afatinib and Pembrolizumab for Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ALPHA Study): A Phase II Study with Biomarker Analysis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multi-agent chemotherapy for refractory head and neck cancer.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Y GuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: pattrickguo@gmail.com.
M-J AhnDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
A ChanState Key Laboratory in Translational Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
C-H WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan.
J-H KangThe Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul.
S-B KimDepartment of Otolaryngology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
M BelloDepartment of Oncology, St Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
R S AroraDepartment Oncology, Sujan Surgical Cancer Hospital and Amravati Cancer Foundation, Amravati, India.
Q ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
X HeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing.
P LiWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
A DechaphunkulDivision of Medical Oncology, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
V KumarDepartment of Surgical Oncology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow.
K KambleDepartment of Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, India.
W LiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, First Hospital Affiliated to Jilin University, Jilin, China.
A KandilInternal Medicine, Alexandria University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.
E E W CohenDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Y GengBiostatistics, Boehringer Ingelheim (China) Investment Co., Ltd, China.
E ZografosClinical Development and Medical Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.
P Z TangDepartment of Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment options are limited for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) following progression after first-line platinum-based therapy, particularly in Asian countries. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this randomised, open-label, phase III trial, we enrolled Asian patients aged ≥18 years, with histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent/metastatic HNSCC following first-line platinum-based therapy who were not amenable for salvage surgery or radiotherapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0/1. Patients were randomised (2 : 1) to receive oral afatinib (40 mg/day) or intravenous methotrexate (40 mg/m2/week), stratified by ECOG performance status and prior EGFR-targeted antibody therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent central review committee blinded to treatment allocation.

resultsA total of 340 patients were randomised (228 afatinib; 112 methotrexate). After a median follow-up of 6.4 months, afatinib significantly decreased the risk of progression/death by 37% versus methotrexate (hazard ratio 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.82; P = 0.0005; median 2.9 versus 2.6 months; landmark analysis at 12 and 24 weeks, 58% versus 41%, 21% versus 9%). Improved PFS was complemented by quality of life benefits. Objective response rate was 28% with afatinib and 13% with methotrexate. There was no significant difference in overall survival. The most common grade ≥3 drug-related adverse events were rash/acne (4% with afatinib versus 0% with methotrexate), diarrhoea (4% versus 0%), fatigue (1% versus 5%), anaemia (<1% versus 5%) and leukopenia (0% versus 5%).

conclusionsConsistent with the phase III LUX-Head & Neck 1 trial, afatinib significantly improved PFS versus methotrexate, with a manageable safety profile. These results demonstrate the efficacy and feasibility of afatinib as a second-line treatment option for certain patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01856478.

Indexed as

AdultAfatinibAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAsian PeopleCarboplatinCisplatinDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMethotrexateAfatinibAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCisplatinMethotrexateafatinibAsianHNSCCmethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID31501887
PMCPMC6927323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.