Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501871›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

scds: computational annotation of doublets in single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Abha S Bais, Dennis Kostka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
204citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

204 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Decoding Immune Cell Doublets in Humans: From Artifacts to Insights.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abha S BaisDepartment of Developmental Biology, USA.
Dennis KostkaDepartment of Developmental Biology, USA.

Funding

Modeling the Dynamics of Genome-Scale Data Across TreesR01GM115836 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CAPRA, JOHN ANTHONY, KOSTKA, DENNIS · 2015 to 2017
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies enable the study of transcriptional heterogeneity at the resolution of individual cells and have an increasing impact on biomedical research. However, it is known that these methods sometimes wrongly consider two or more cells as single cells, and that a number of so-called doublets is present in the output of such experiments. Treating doublets as single cells in downstream analyses can severely bias a study's conclusions, and therefore computational strategies for the identification of doublets are needed.

resultsWith scds, we propose two new approaches for in silico doublet identification: Co-expression based doublet scoring (cxds) and binary classification based doublet scoring (bcds). The co-expression based approach, cxds, utilizes binarized (absence/presence) gene expression data and, employing a binomial model for the co-expression of pairs of genes, yields interpretable doublet annotations. bcds, on the other hand, uses a binary classification approach to discriminate artificial doublets from original data. We apply our methods and existing computational doublet identification approaches to four datasets with experimental doublet annotations and find that our methods perform at least as well as the state of the art, at comparably little computational cost. We observe appreciable differences between methods and across datasets and that no approach dominates all others. In summary, scds presents a scalable, competitive approach that allows for doublet annotation of datasets with thousands of cells in a matter of seconds. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: scds is implemented as a Bioconductor R package (doi: 10.18129/B9.bioc.scds). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

RNASoftwareBase SequenceSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisRNA

Identifiers

PMID31501871
PMCPMC7703774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.