Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501805›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in toxicology2019

Considerations for Strategic Use of High-Throughput Transcriptomics Chemical Screening Data in Regulatory Decisions.

Joshua Harrill, Imran Shah, R Woodrow Setzer, Derik Haggard, Scott Auerbach, Richard Judson, Russell S Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A targeted lipidomics workflow for high-throughput phenotyping and mechanism-based in vitro hepatotoxicity studies.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The OASIS Consortium: integrating multi-omics technologies to transform chemical safety assessment.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Investigating the dependency of in vitro benchmark concentrations on exposure time in transcriptomics experiments.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Development and application of consensusFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua HarrillNational Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Imran ShahNational Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
R Woodrow SetzerNational Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Derik HaggardOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
Scott AuerbachNational Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institute of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Richard JudsonNational Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Russell S ThomasNational Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, numerous organizations, including governmental regulatory agencies in the U.S. and abroad, have proposed using data from New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for augmenting and increasing the pace of chemical assessments. NAMs are broadly defined as any technology, methodology, approach or combination thereof that can be used to provide information on chemical hazard and risk assessment that avoids the use of intact animals. High-throughput transcriptomics (HTTr) is a type of NAM that uses gene expression profiling as an endpoint for rapidly evaluating the effects of large numbers of chemicals on

Identifiers

PMID31501805
PMCPMC6733036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.