Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501712›Full record

ReviewImmune network2019

Emerging Themes for the Role of Antibodies in Tuberculosis.

Andy C Tran, Mi-Young Kim, Rajko Reljic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immune network, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antibodies as clinical tools for tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The role of antibodies in tuberculosis diagnosis, prophylaxis and therapy: a review from the ESGMYC study group.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. RNA Sensing ofVaccines · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andy C TranSt George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4019-1318
Mi-Young KimSt George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.
Rajko ReljicSt George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4351-8355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The best way to debunk a scientific dogma is to throw irrefutable evidence at it. This is especially true if the dogma in question has been nurtured over many decades, as is the case with the apparent redundancy of antibodies (Abs) against intracellular pathogens. Although not fully compelling yet, that 'hard core' evidence is nevertheless now slowly beginning to emerge. This is true for several clinically relevant infections but none more so than

Indexed as

AntibodiesImmunotherapyInfectionTuberculosisVaccines

Identifiers

PMID31501712
PMCPMC6722270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.