Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501463›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Neonicotinoid seed treatments of soybean provide negligible benefits to US farmers.

Spyridon Mourtzinis, Christian H Krupke, Paul D Esker, Adam Varenhorst, Nicholas J Arneson, Carl A Bradley, Adam M Byrne, Martin I Chilvers, Loren J Giesler, Ames Herbert and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. IPM reduces insecticide applications by 95% while maintaining or enhancing crop yields through wild pollinator conservation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Opinion: Neonicotinoids pose undocumented threats to food webs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Spyridon MourtzinisDepartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, United States. agstat001@gmail.com.
Christian H KrupkeDepartment of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, United States.
Paul D EskerDepartment of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, 16801, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7753-3476
Adam VarenhorstDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, Brookings, SD, 57007, United States.
Nicholas J ArnesonDepartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, United States.
Carl A BradleyDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky Research & Education Center, Princeton, KY, 42445, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8334-0750
Adam M ByrneDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, United States.
Martin I ChilversDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, United States.
Loren J GieslerDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68583, United States.
Ames HerbertDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Suffolk, VA, 23437, United States.
Yuba R KandelDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, United States.
Maciej J KazulaDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, United States.
Catherine HuntDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, United States.
Laura E LindseyDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, United States.
Sean MaloneDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Suffolk, VA, 23437, United States.
Daren S MuellerDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, United States.
Seth NaeveDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, United States.
Emerson NafzigerDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States.
Dominic D ReisigDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Vernon James Research and Extension Center, Plymouth, NC, 27962, United States.
William J RossDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, 72204, United States.
Devon R RossmanDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, United States.
Sally TaylorDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Suffolk, VA, 23437, United States.
Shawn P ConleyDepartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonicotinoids are the most widely used insecticides worldwide and are typically deployed as seed treatments (hereafter NST) in many grain and oilseed crops, including soybeans. However, there is a surprising dearth of information regarding NST effectiveness in increasing soybean seed yield, and most published data suggest weak, or inconsistent yield benefit. The US is the key soybean-producing nation worldwide and this work includes soybean yield data from 194 randomized and replicated field studies conducted specifically to evaluate the effect of NSTs on soybean seed yield at sites within 14 states from 2006 through 2017. Here we show that across the principal soybean-growing region of the country, there are negligible and management-specific yield benefits attributed to NSTs. Across the entire region, the maximum observed yield benefits due to fungicide (FST = fungicide seed treatment) + neonicotinoid use (FST + NST) reached 0.13 Mg/ha. Across the entire region, combinations of management practices affected the effectiveness of FST + NST to increase yield but benefits were minimal ranging between 0.01 to 0.22 Mg/ha. Despite widespread use, this practice appears to have little benefit for most of soybean producers; across the entire region, a partial economic analysis further showed inconsistent evidence of a break-even cost of FST or FST + NST. These results demonstrate that the current widespread prophylactic use of NST in the key soybean-producing areas of the US should be re-evaluated by producers and regulators alike.

Indexed as

Crop ProtectionGlycine maxInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsSeedsCost-Benefit AnalysisCrop ProductionFarmersFungicides, IndustrialHumansRandom AllocationUnited StatesFungicides, IndustrialInsecticidesNeonicotinoids

Identifiers

PMID31501463
PMCPMC6733863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.