Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501296›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Disentangling Hippocampal and Amygdala Contribution to Human Anxiety-Like Behavior.

Dominik R Bach, Martina Hoffmann, Carsten Finke, Rene Hurlemann, Christoph J Ploner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Scaling of Ventral Hippocampal Activity during Anxiety.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anxiety and depression: A top-down, bottom-up model of circuit function.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prefrontal cortex interactions with the amygdala in primates.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hippocampal Representation of Threat Features and Behavior in a Human Approach-Avoidance Conflict Anxiety Task.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dominik R BachComputational Psychiatry Research, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland, dominik.bach@uzh.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-3717-2036
Martina HoffmannDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Carsten FinkeDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7665-1171
Rene HurlemannDepartment of Psychiatry and Division of Medical Psychology, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany, and.ORCID 0000-0003-2628-565X
Christoph J PlonerDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin 10117 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 091593/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety comprises a suite of behaviors to deal with potential threat and is often modeled in approach-avoidance conflict tasks. Collectively, these tests constitute a predominant preclinical model of anxiety disorder. A body of evidence suggests that both ventral hippocampus and amygdala lesions impair anxiety-like behavior, but the relative contribution of these two structures is unclear. A possible reason is that approach-avoidance conflict tasks involve a series of decisions and actions, which may be controlled by distinct neural mechanisms that are difficult to disentangle from behavioral readouts. Here, we capitalize on a human approach-avoidance conflict test, implemented as computer game, that separately measures several action components. We investigate three patients of both sexes with unspecific unilateral medial temporal lobe (MTL) damage, one male with selective bilateral hippocampal (HC), and one female with selective bilateral amygdala lesions, and compare them to matched controls. MTL and selective HC lesions, but not selective amygdala lesions, increased approach decision when possible loss was high. In contrast, MTL and selective amygdala lesions, but not selective HC lesions, increased return latency. Additionally, selective HC and selective amygdala lesions reduced approach latency. In a task targeted at revealing subjective assumptions about the structure of the computer game, MTL and selective HC lesions impacted on reaction time generation but not on the subjective task structure. We conclude that deciding to approach reward under threat relies on hippocampus but not amygdala, whereas vigor of returning to safety depends on amygdala but not on hippocampus.

Indexed as

RewardAdultAmygdalaAnxietyAvoidance LearningConditioning, OperantConflict, PsychologicalDecision MakingFemaleHippocampusHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological Testsanxiety-like behaviorapproach–avoidance conflictapproach decisionclinical lesion modelsdouble-dissociationescape vigor

Identifiers

PMID31501296
PMCPMC6807285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.