Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501108›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Impact of gestational age on child intelligence, attention and executive function at age 5: a cohort study.

Emilie Pi Fogtmann Sejer, Frederik Jager Bruun, Julie Anna Slavensky, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cognitive and Learning Outcomes in Late Preterm Infants at School Age: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emilie Pi Fogtmann SejerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark empifo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6636-155X
Frederik Jager BruunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Julie Anna SlavenskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Erik Lykke MortensenUnit of Medical Psychology, Department of Public Health and Center for Healthy Ageing, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ulrik Schiøler KesmodelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPreterm birth can affect cognition, but other factors including parental education and intelligence may also play a role, but few studies have adjusted for these potential confounders. We aimed to assess the impact of gestational age (GA), late preterm birth (34 to <37 weeks GA) and very to moderately preterm birth (<34 weeks GA) on intelligence, attention and executive function in a population of Danish children aged 5 years.

designPopulation-based prospective cohort study.

settingDenmark 2003-2008.

participantsA cohort of 1776 children and their mothers sampled from the Danish National Birth Cohort with information on GA, family and background factors and completed neuropsychological assessment at age 5. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised, Test of Everyday Attention for Children at Five and Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function scores.

resultsFor preterm birth <34 weeks GA (n=8), the mean difference in full-scale intelligence quotient(IQ) was -10.6 points (95% CI -19.4 to -1.8) when compared with the term group ≥37 weeks GA (n=1728), and adjusted for potential confounders. For the teacher-assessed Global Executive Composite, the mean difference was 5.3 points (95% CI 2.4 to 8.3) in the adjusted analysis, indicating more executive function difficulties in the preterm group <34 weeks GA compared with the term group. Maternal intelligence and parental education were weak confounders. No associations between late preterm birth 34 to <37 weeks GA (n=40) and poor cognition were shown.

conclusionsThis study showed substantially lower intelligence and poorer executive function in children born <34 weeks GA compared with children born at term. GA may play an important role in determining cognitive abilities independent of maternal intelligence and parental education. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings, as the proportion of children born preterm in this study population was small.

Indexed as

AttentionExecutive FunctionGestational AgeIntelligenceChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMalePremature BirthProspective StudiesWechsler Scalesattentionchild developmentexecutive functiongestational ageintelligencepreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID31501108
PMCPMC6738700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.