Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501097›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

'Mind the gaps': the accessibility and implementation of an effective depression relapse prevention programme in UK NHS services: learning from mindfulness-based cognitive therapy through a mixed-methods study.

Jo Rycroft-Malone, Felix Gradinger, Heledd Owen Griffiths, Rob Anderson, Rebecca Susan Crane, Andy Gibson, Stewart W Mercer, Willem Kuyken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mindfulness-Based Programs: Why, When, and How to Adapt?Global advances in health and medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jo Rycroft-MaloneSchool of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Felix GradingerInstitute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Heledd Owen GriffithsSchool of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Rob AndersonPeninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Rebecca Susan CraneSchool of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Andy GibsonHealth and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Stewart W MercerInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Willem KuykenPsychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8596-5252
Bangor University · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

Department of Health 12/64/187Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104908/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust WT104908MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is an evidence-based approach for people at risk of depressive relapse to support their long-term recovery. However, despite its inclusion in guidelines, there is an 'implementation cliff'. The study objective was to develop a better explanation of what facilitates MBCT implementation.

settingUK primary and secondary care mental health services. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsA national two-phase, multi-method qualitative study was conducted, which was conceptually underpinned by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework. Phase I involved interviews with stakeholders from 40 service providers about current provision of MBCT. Phase II involved 10 purposively sampled case studies to obtain a more detailed understanding of MBCT implementation. Data were analysed using adapted framework analysis, refined through stakeholder consultation.

resultsAccess to MBCT is variable across the UK services. Where available, services have adapted MBCT to fit their context by integrating it into their care pathways. Evidence was often important to implementation but took different forms: the NICE depression guideline, audits, evaluations, first person accounts, experiential taster sessions and pilots. These were used to build a platform from which to develop MBCT services. The most important aspect of facilitation was the central role of the MBCT implementers. These were generally self-designated individuals who 'championed' grass-roots implementation. Our explanatory framework mapped out a prototypical implementation journey, often over many years with a balance of bottom-up and top-down factors influencing the fit of MBCT into service pathways. 'Pivot points' in the implementation journey provided windows of either challenge or opportunity.

conclusionsThis is one of the largest systematic studies of the implementation of a psychological therapy. While access to MBCT across the UK is improving, it remains patchy. The resultant explanatory framework about MBCT implementation provides a heuristic that informed an implementation resource.

Indexed as

Health Plan ImplementationHealth Services AccessibilityChronic DiseaseCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressive DisorderHumansInterviews as TopicMindfulnessPatient ParticipationRecurrenceUnited Kingdomdepressionimplementationimplementation sciencemindfulnessmindfulness-based cognitive therapyPARIHSpsychological therapy

Identifiers

PMID31501097
PMCPMC6738673
OpenAlexW2972438316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.