Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31501043›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical lipidology

The use of structured data elements to identify ASCVD patients with statin-associated side effects: Insights from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Salim S Virani, Julia M Akeroyd, Sarah T Ahmed, Chayakrit Krittanawong, Lindsey A Martin, Jason Slagle, Glenn T Gobbel, Michael E Matheny, Christie M Ballantyne, Laura A Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical lipidology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Salim S ViraniHealth Policy, Quality & Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Cardiology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: virani@bcm.edu.
Julia M AkeroydHealth Policy, Quality & Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sarah T AhmedHealth Policy, Quality & Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Chayakrit KrittanawongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai St. Luke's and Mount Sinai West, NY, New York, USA.
Lindsey A MartinHealth Policy, Quality & Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jason SlagleDepartment of Anesthesiology, Center for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Veterans Affairs, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA.
Glenn T GobbelDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Michael E MathenyDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Christie M BallantyneSection of Cardiology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Laura A PetersenHealth Policy, Quality & Informatics Program, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Health Services Research & Development Center for Innovations, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

HSRD VA I01 HX002225HSRD VA I01 HX002917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate identification of patients with statin-associated side effects (SASEs) is critical for health care systems to institute strategies to improve guideline-concordant statin use.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine whether adverse drug reaction (ADR) entry by clinicians in the electronic medical record can accurately identify SASEs.

methodsWe identified 1,248,214 atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients seeking care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Using an ADR data repository, we identified SASEs in 15 major symptom categories. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed using a chart review of 256 ASCVD patients with identified SASEs, who were not on high-intensity statin therapy.

resultsWe identified 171,189 patients (13.71%) with documented SASEs over a 15-year period (9.9%, 2.7%, and 1.1% to 1, 2, or >2 statins, respectively). Statin use, high-intensity statin use, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were 72%, 28.1%, 99 mg/dL, and 129 mg/dL among those with vs 81%, 31.1%, 84 mg/dL, and 111 mg/dL among those without SASEs. Progressively lower statin and high-intensity statin use, and higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were noted among those with SASEs to 1, 2, or >2 statins. Two-thirds of SASEs were related to muscle symptoms. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV compared with manual chart review were 63.4%, 100%, 100%, and 85.3%, respectively.

conclusionA strategy of using ADR entry in the electronic medical record is feasible to identify SASEs with modest sensitivity and NPV but high specificity and PPV. Health care systems can use this strategy to identify ASCVD patients with SASEs and operationalize efforts to improve guideline-concordant lipid-lowering therapy use in such patients. The sensitivity of this approach can be further enhanced by the use of unstructured text data.

Indexed as

United States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransAgedAtherosclerosisCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMalePredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityUnited StatesCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAdverse drug reactionAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseElectronic medical recordStatin-associated side effectsStatins

Identifiers

PMID31501043
PMCPMC8393880

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.