ArticleTicks and tick-borne diseases2020
Detection of 'Candidatus Ehrlichia khabarensis' in rodents and ticks removed from rodents in British Columbia, Canada.
Article in Ticks and tick-borne diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The presence ofmSphere · 2023Article
- Ticks and tick-borne microbes identified through passive and active surveillance in Alaska.Journal of medical entomology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
'Candidatus Ehrlichia khabarensis' was first described from rodents and insectivores in the Far East territory of Khabarovsk on the Russian Pacific Coast. Here we report the detection of DNA from this microorganism in rodents and fed ticks collected from rodents in British Columbia, Canada in 2013-2014. 'Candidatus Ehrlichia khabarensis' was detected in (i) a female Ixodes angustus tick collected from a Peromyscus maniculatus; (ii) a female Dermacentor andersoni tick collected from a Perognathus parvus; (iii) a pool of 2 larval Ixodes pacificus ticks collected from a single P. maniculatus; and (iv) a pool of 3 nymphal I. pacificus ticks collected from a single P. maniculatus. Three of these four rodents (2 P. maniculatus and 1 P. parvus) with infected ticks also had evidence of 'Candidatus Ehrlichia khabarensis' in at least one tissue type. The infected P. maniculatus and Ixodes ticks came from the Vancouver area in western British Columbia and the P. parvus and Dermacentor tick from an inland site in central British Columbia. Although it remains to be determined whether 'Candidatus Ehrlichia khabarensis' has any negative impacts on wildlife, domestic animals or humans, we note that all three tick species found to contain the DNA of this microorganism are known to bite humans. Future detection of this microorganism either in ticks collected from rodents and allowed to molt to the next life stage prior to being tested, or from host-seeking ticks, is required to determine if it can survive the tick's molt after being ingested via an infectious blood meal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.