The broken promise of remote ischaemic conditioning.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Remote ischemic conditioning in the treatment of acute cerebral infarction: A case control study.Heliyon · 2023
   Article
2. The BE COOL Treatments (Batroxobin, oxygEn, Conditioning, and cOOLing): Emerging Adjunct Therapies for Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
   Review
3. Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Ischemic Stroke and Myocardial Infarction: Similarities and Differences.Frontiers in neurology · 2021
   Review
4. Metoprolol blunts the time-dependent progression of infarct size.Basic research in cardiology · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI): a single-blind randomised controlled trial.2019

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as