Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31500358›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Multi-Service Programs for Pregnant and Parenting Women with Substance Use Concerns: Women's Perspectives on Why They Seek Help and Their Significant Changes.

Carol Hubberstey, Deborah Rutman, Rose A Schmidt, Marilyn Van Bibber, Nancy Poole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Missing in Action: Sex and Gender in Substance Use Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carol HubbersteyPrincipal, Nota Bene Consulting Group, Victoria, BC V8R 3M4, Canada. carolmarie@shaw.ca.
Deborah RutmanPrincipal, Nota Bene Consulting Group, Victoria, BC V8R 3M4, Canada. drutman@uvic.ca.
Rose A SchmidtCentre of Excellence for Women's Health, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada. Rose.Schmidt@cw.bc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0307-8482
Marilyn Van BibberPrincipal, Nota Bene Consulting Group, Victoria, BC V8R 3M4, Canada. mvanbibber@shaw.ca.
Nancy PooleCentre of Excellence for Women's Health, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada. wavelength@telus.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within Canada, several specialized multi-service prevention programs work with highly vulnerable pregnant and early parenting women with substance use issues. Experiences of trauma, mental health, poverty, and other factors associated with the social determinants of health complete the picture. Program evaluations have demonstrated their value, but less has been said as to women's reasons for choosing to seek help from these programs, what they were hoping to gain, or what difference they believe has occurred as a result. The Co-creating Evidence project is a multi-year (2017-2020) national evaluation of holistic programs serving women at high risk of having an infant with prenatal alcohol or substance exposure. The evaluation uses a mixed methods design involving quarterly program output and "snapshot" client data, as well as in-person, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires with clients, program staff, and program partners. This article presents findings from interviews with women regarding why they sought help, how they used the services, and what they perceived to be the most significant change in their lives as a result. Obtaining help with substance use was the top theme for what women hoped to get from their participation in their program; however, women's reasons were often intertwined. Additional motivations included wanting information, support or assistance with: child welfare; pregnancy; housing; getting connected to health care or prenatal care; and opportunities for peer support. With respect to the most significant life change, themes included: reduced substance use; improved housing; stronger mother-child connection; and improved wellness and social connections. Findings demonstrated that vulnerable, marginalized pregnant and parenting women who are using substances will seek help when health and social care services are configured in such a way as to take into consideration and address their unique roles, responsibilities, and realities.

Indexed as

AdultAlcoholismCanadaFemaleHousingHumansMotivationParentingPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareProgram EvaluationSubstance-Related Disordersalcoholclient perspectivesFASD preventiongendermulti-service program deliverypregnancyprogram evaluationsubstance use

Identifiers

PMID31500358
PMCPMC6765994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.