ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019
Independent Component Analysis for Unraveling the Complexity of Cancer Omics Datasets.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptional regulatory network differences between six industrialMetabolic engineering communications · 2026Article
- Review
- Identifying clinically relevant cell state interactions in the tumor microenvironment of IDH-mutant gliomas using CSI-TME.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Unveiling patterns: an exploration of machine learning techniques for unsupervised feature selection in single-cell data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Cell-type deconvolution methods for spatial transcriptomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- Detecting signatures underlying the composition of biological data.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in precision medicine: transforming disease subtyping, medical imaging, and pharmacogenomics.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2025Article
- Electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis of hue perception differences between art and non-art majors: insights from the P2 and P3 components.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Simplicity within biological complexity.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Computational deconvolution of DNA methylation data from mixed DNA samples.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- DECOMICS, a shiny application for unsupervised cell type deconvolution and biological interpretation of bulk omic data.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- The axes of biology: a novel axes-based network embedding paradigm to decipher the functional mechanisms of the cell.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- CellsFromSpace: a fast, accurate, and reference-free tool to deconvolve and annotate spatially distributed omics data.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- consICA: an R package for robust reference-free deconvolution of multi-omics data.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of miRNA-mRNA regulatory pairs associated with colorectal cancer and the role in tumor immunity.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Article
- Domain Adaptation Principal Component Analysis: Base Linear Method for Learning with Out-of-Distribution Data.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- robustica: customizable robust independent component analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Integrative omics approaches for biosynthetic pathway discovery in plants.Natural product reports · 2022Review
- DrDimont: explainable drug response prediction from differential analysis of multi-omics networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Independent component analysis (ICA) is a matrix factorization approach where the signals captured by each individual matrix factors are optimized to become as mutually independent as possible. Initially suggested for solving source blind separation problems in various fields, ICA was shown to be successful in analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and other types of biomedical data. In the last twenty years, ICA became a part of the standard machine learning toolbox, together with other matrix factorization methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). Here, we review a number of recent works where ICA was shown to be a useful tool for unraveling the complexity of cancer biology from the analysis of different types of omics data, mainly collected for tumoral samples. Such works highlight the use of ICA in dimensionality reduction, deconvolution, data pre-processing, meta-analysis, and others applied to different data types (transcriptome, methylome, proteome, single-cell data). We particularly focus on the technical aspects of ICA application in omics studies such as using different protocols, determining the optimal number of components, assessing and improving reproducibility of the ICA results, and comparison with other popular matrix factorization techniques. We discuss the emerging ICA applications to the integrative analysis of multi-level omics datasets and introduce a conceptual view on ICA as a tool for defining functional subsystems of a complex biological system and their interactions under various conditions. Our review is accompanied by a Jupyter notebook which illustrates the discussed concepts and provides a practical tool for applying ICA to the analysis of cancer omics datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.