Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31500324›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Independent Component Analysis for Unraveling the Complexity of Cancer Omics Datasets.

Nicolas Sompairac, Petr V Nazarov, Urszula Czerwinska, Laura Cantini, Anne Biton, Askhat Molkenov, Zhaxybay Zhumadilov, Emmanuel Barillot, Francois Radvanyi, Alexander Gorban and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Simplicity within biological complexity.Bioinformatics advances · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicolas SompairacInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France. nicolas.sompairac@curie.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-8759-2077
Petr V NazarovMultiomics Data Science Research Group, Quantitative Biology Unit, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), L-1445 Strassen, Luxembourg. Petr.Nazarov@lih.lu.
Urszula CzerwinskaInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France. ulcia.liberte@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5244-0708
Laura CantiniComputational Systems Biology Team, Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS UMR8197, INSERM U1024, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France. laura.cantini@ens.fr.
Anne BitonCentre de Bioinformatique, Biostatistique et Biologie Intégrative (C3BI, USR 3756 Institut Pasteur et CNRS), 75015 Paris, France. anne.biton@gmail.com.
Askhat MolkenovLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Center for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, 010000 Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. askhat.molkenov@nu.edu.kz.
Zhaxybay ZhumadilovLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Center for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, 010000 Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. zzhumadilov@nu.edu.kz.
Emmanuel BarillotInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France. emmanuel.barillot@curie.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-2724-2002
Francois RadvanyiInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France. francois.radvanyi@curie.fr.
Alexander GorbanCenter for Mathematical Modeling, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK. a.n.gorban@leicester.ac.uk.
Ulykbek KairovLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Center for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, 010000 Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. ulykbek.kairov@nu.edu.kz.ORCID 0000-0001-8511-8064
Andrei ZinovyevInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France. andrei.zinovyev@curie.fr.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 program 826121, iPCEuropean Union's IMI program IMMUCANLuxembourg National Research Fund C17/BM/11664971/DEMICSMinistry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan IRN: AP05134722Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan IRN: AP05135430Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 14.Y26.31.0022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Independent component analysis (ICA) is a matrix factorization approach where the signals captured by each individual matrix factors are optimized to become as mutually independent as possible. Initially suggested for solving source blind separation problems in various fields, ICA was shown to be successful in analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and other types of biomedical data. In the last twenty years, ICA became a part of the standard machine learning toolbox, together with other matrix factorization methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). Here, we review a number of recent works where ICA was shown to be a useful tool for unraveling the complexity of cancer biology from the analysis of different types of omics data, mainly collected for tumoral samples. Such works highlight the use of ICA in dimensionality reduction, deconvolution, data pre-processing, meta-analysis, and others applied to different data types (transcriptome, methylome, proteome, single-cell data). We particularly focus on the technical aspects of ICA application in omics studies such as using different protocols, determining the optimal number of components, assessing and improving reproducibility of the ICA results, and comparison with other popular matrix factorization techniques. We discuss the emerging ICA applications to the integrative analysis of multi-level omics datasets and introduce a conceptual view on ICA as a tool for defining functional subsystems of a complex biological system and their interactions under various conditions. Our review is accompanied by a Jupyter notebook which illustrates the discussed concepts and provides a practical tool for applying ICA to the analysis of cancer omics datasets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualData CurationHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasmsPrincipal Component Analysiscancerdata analysisdata integrationdimension reductionindependent component analysisomics data

Identifiers

PMID31500324
PMCPMC6771121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.