Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31500302›Full record

ReviewToxics2019

Dietary Contaminants and Their Effects on Zebrafish Embryos.

Marc Tye, Mark A Masino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marc TyeDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota Twin-Cities Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. mttye@umn.edu.
Mark A MasinoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota Twin-Cities Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. masino@umn.edu.

Funding

Dopaminergic modulation of spinal locomotor circuitsR01NS094176 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MASINO, MARK A · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NIH HHS NS094176NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary contaminants are often an over-looked factor in the health of zebrafish. Typically, water is considered to be the source for most contaminants, especially within an aquatic environment. For this reason, source water for zebrafish recirculating systems is highly regulated and monitored daily. Most facilities use reverse osmosis or de-ionized water filtration systems to purify incoming water to ensure that contaminants, as well as pathogens, do not enter their zebrafish housing units. However, diets are rarely tested for contaminants and, in the case of manufactured zebrafish feeds, since the product is marketed for aquaculture or aquarium use it is assumed that the feed is acceptable for animals used for research. The following provides examples as to how contaminants could lead to negative effects on development and behavior of developing zebrafish.

Indexed as

behaviorcontaminantdevelopmentheavy metalspersistent organic pollutanttoxinzebrafish diet

Identifiers

PMID31500302
PMCPMC6789805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.