Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31500269›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2019

Maize Inoculation with Microbial Consortia: Contrasting Effects on Rhizosphere Activities, Nutrient Acquisition and Early Growth in Different Soils.

Klára Bradáčová, Maximilian Sittinger, Katharina Tietz, Benjamin Neuhäuser, Ellen Kandeler, Nils Berger, Uwe Ludewig, Günter Neumann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Draft Genome Sequence ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Phenotype Assessment and Putative Mechanisms of Ammonium Toxicity to Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Developmental plasticity ofPlant direct · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bacterial Community Members IncreasePhytobiomes journal · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Klára BradáčováInstitute of Crop Science (340h), Universität Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 20, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany. klara.bradacova@uni-hohenheim.de.
Maximilian SittingerJulius Kühn-Institut, Institute for Biological Control, Heinrichstraße 243, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany. maximilian.sittinger@julius-kuehn.de.
Katharina TietzInstitute of Crop Science (340h), Universität Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 20, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany. katharina.tietz95@googlemail.com.
Benjamin NeuhäuserInstitute of Crop Science (340h), Universität Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 20, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany. benjamin.neuhaeuser@uni-hohenheim.de.
Ellen KandelerInstitute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, Soil Biology Department, Universität Hohenheim, Emil-Wolff-Straße 27, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany. kandeler@uni-hohenheim.de.
Nils BergerEuroChem Agro GmbH, 8165 Mannheim, Germany. nils.berger@eurochemgroup.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7320-0412
Uwe LudewigInstitute of Crop Science (340h), Universität Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 20, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany. u.ludewig@uni-hohenheim.de.
Günter NeumannInstitute of Crop Science (340h), Universität Hohenheim, Fruwirthstraße 20, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany. guenter.neumann@uni-hohenheim.de.
University of Hohenheim · DEJulius Kühn-Institut · DE

Funding

European Community´s FP7 Programme/2007-2013 312117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefit of plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) as plant inoculants is influenced by a wide range of environmental factors. Therefore, microbial consortia products (MCPs) based on multiple PGPM strains with complementary functions, have been proposed as superior, particularly under challenging environmental conditions and for restoration of beneficial microbial communities in disturbed soil environments. To test this hypothesis, the performance of a commercial MCP inoculant based on 22 PGPM strains was investigated in greenhouse experiments with maize on three soils with contrasting pH, organic matter content and microbial activity, under different P and N fertilization regimes. Interestingly, the MCP inoculant stimulated root and shoot growth and improved the acquisition of macronutrients only on a freshly collected field soil with high organic matter content, exclusively in combination with stabilized ammonium fertilization. This was associated with transiently increased expression of

Indexed as

ammoniumauxin-responsive genesmicrobial consortiaplant growth-promoting microorganismsplant–microbial interactionsP solubilization

Identifiers

PMID31500269
PMCPMC6780557
OpenAlexW2972101047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.