Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31499598›Full record

ArticleAnnals of rehabilitation medicine2019

Effects of Combined Upper Limb Robotic Therapy in Patients With Tetraplegic Spinal Cord Injury.

Joo Hwan Jung, Hye Jin Lee, Duk Youn Cho, Jung-Eun Lim, Bum Suk Lee, Seung Hyun Kwon, Hae Young Kim, Su Jeong Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06775925 (Robot-assisted vs. Conventional Occupational Therapy of the Upper Limb in Individuals With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06775925 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Robot-assisted vs. Conventional Occupational Therapy of the Upper Limb in Individuals With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: The Armeo X-over Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwiss Paraplegic Research, NottwilRan2025 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsCervical Spinal Cord InjuryArmsUnilateral robot-assisted therapy (RT), Unilateral conventional occupational therapy (OT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joo Hwan JungDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.
Hye Jin LeeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.
Duk Youn ChoTranslational Research Center for Rehabilitation Robots, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jung-Eun LimTranslational Research Center for Rehabilitation Robots, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.
Bum Suk LeeTranslational Research Center for Rehabilitation Robots, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Hyun KwonDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.
Hae Young KimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.
Su Jeong LeeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.
National Rehabilitation Center · KR

Funding

Korea National Rehabilitation CenterMinistry of Health and WelfareTranslational Research Center for Rehabilitation Robots NRCTR-IN17001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo confirm the effects of combined upper limb robotic therapy (RT) as compared to conventional occupational therapy (OT) in tetraplegic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients and to suggest the optimized treatment guidelines of combined upper limb RT.

methodsAfter subject recruitment and screening for eligibility, the baseline evaluation for outcome measures were performed. We evaluated the Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP), the American Spinal Injury Association upper extremity motor score, grip and pinch strength, and the Spinal Cord Independence Measurement III (SCIM-III). In this study, the pre-tested participants were divided randomly into the RT and OT group. The utilized interventions included combined upper limb RT using ArmeoPower and Amadeo (RT group), or conventional OT (OT group) in addition to daily inpatient rehabilitation program. The participants underwent 40 minutes×3 sessions×5 weeks of interventions.

resultsA total of 30 tetraplegic SCI patients completed entire study program. After 5 weeks of intervention, both groups demonstrated increases in GRASSP-strength and SCIM-III. The manual muscle test scores of elbow flexion, elbow extension, 2-5th metacarpophalangeal extension, and SCIM-III subscores of bathing-upper, dressing-upper, and grooming as well as the GRASSP-qualitative prehension score were noted to have been significantly increased in the RT group as evaluated. The OT group showed improvements in the GRASSP-quantitative prehension score and some items in grip and pinch strength. There was no significant difference between the two groups in almost all measurements except for the SCIM-III bathing-upper subscore.

conclusionCombined upper limb RT demonstrated beneficial effects on the upper limb motor function in patients with tetraplegic SCI, which were comparable with conventional OT.

Indexed as

RehabilitationRoboticsSpinal cord injuriesUpper extremity

Identifiers

PMID31499598
PMCPMC6734021
OpenAlexW2972101200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.