Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31499528›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of internal medicine2019

Menopausal Estrogen-Alone Therapy and Health Outcomes in Women With and Without Bilateral Oophorectomy: A Randomized Trial.

JoAnn E Manson, Aaron K Aragaki, Shari S Bassuk, Rowan T Chlebowski, Garnet L Anderson, Jacques E Rossouw, Barbara V Howard, Cynthia A Thomson, Marcia L Stefanick, Andrew M Kaunitz and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00000611 (Women's Health Initiative), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00000611 phase3completednot on this map

Women's Health Initiative (WHI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)ConditionsBone Diseases, Breast Neoplasms, Cardiovascular Diseases, Colonic NeoplasmsArmshormone replacement therapy, estrogens, progestins, estrogen replacement therapy, diet, fat-restricted
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brazilian Guideline on Menopausal Cardiovascular Health - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Estrogens and breast cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Brazilian Guideline on Menopausal Cardiovascular Health - 2024.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Hormones and Aging: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Premature or early bilateral oophorectomy: a 2021 update.Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.

JoAnn E MansonBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.E.M., S.S.B.).
Aaron K AragakiFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (A.K.A., G.L.A., R.L.P.).
Shari S BassukBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (J.E.M., S.S.B.).
Rowan T ChlebowskiCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California (R.T.C.).
Garnet L AndersonFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (A.K.A., G.L.A., R.L.P.).
Jacques E RossouwNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (J.E.R.).
Barbara V HowardMedStar Health Research Institute, Bonita Springs, Florida, and Georgetown-Howard Universities, Washington, DC (B.V.H.).
Cynthia A ThomsonMel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (C.A.T.).
Marcia L StefanickStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, California (M.L.S.).
Andrew M KaunitzUniversity of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida (A.M.K.).
Carolyn J CrandallDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (C.J.C.).
Charles B EatonAlpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (C.B.E., S.L.).
Victor W HendersonStanford University, Stanford, California (V.W.H.).
Simin LiuAlpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island (C.B.E., S.L.).
Juhua LuoBrown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana (J.L.).
Thomas RohanAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (T.R.).
Aladdin H ShadyabUniversity of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California (A.H.S.).
Gretchen WellsUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky (G.W.).
Jean Wactawski-WendeUniversity at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, New York (J.W.).
Ross L PrenticeFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (A.K.A., G.L.A., R.L.P.).
WHI Investigators
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USBrown University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USIndiana University Bloomington · USMedStar Health · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USStanford Health Care · USStanford University · USThe Lundquist Institute · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

VANGUARD CENTER FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVEN01WH032109 · WH · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MANSON, JOANN ELISABETH · 1993 to 2000
$401k
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600001CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600002CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600003CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600004CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600018CWHI NIH HHS N01 WH032109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Whether health outcomes of menopausal estrogen therapy differ between women with and without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is unknown. Objective: To examine estrogen therapy outcomes by BSO status, with additional stratification by 10-year age groups. Design: Subgroup analyses of the randomized Women's Health Initiative Estrogen-Alone Trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00000611). Setting: 40 U.S. clinical centers. Participants: 9939 women aged 50 to 79 years with prior hysterectomy and known oophorectomy status. Intervention: Conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) (0.625 mg/d) or placebo for a median of 7.2 years. Measurements: Incidence of coronary heart disease and invasive breast cancer (the trial's 2 primary end points), all-cause mortality, and a "global index" (these end points plus stroke, pulmonary embolism, colorectal cancer, and hip fracture) during the intervention phase and 18-year cumulative follow-up. Results: The effects of CEE alone did not differ significantly according to BSO status. However, age modified the effect of CEE in women with prior BSO. During the intervention phase, CEE was significantly associated with a net adverse effect (hazard ratio for global index, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.86]) in older women (aged ≥70 years), but the global index was not elevated in younger women (P trend by age = 0.016). During cumulative follow-up, women aged 50 to 59 years with BSO had a treatment-associated reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.68 [CI, 0.48 to 0.96]), whereas older women with BSO had no reduction (P trend by age = 0.034). There was no significant association between CEE and outcomes among women with conserved ovaries, regardless of age. Limitations: The timing of CEE in relation to BSO varied; several comparisons were made without adjustment for multiple testing. Conclusion: The effects of CEE did not differ by BSO status in the overall cohort, but some findings varied by age. Among women with prior BSO, in those aged 70 years or older, CEE led to adverse effects during the treatment period, whereas women randomly assigned to CEE before age 60 seemed to derive mortality benefit over the long term. Primary Funding Source: The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institutes of Health; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Wyeth Ayerst donated the study drugs.

Indexed as

OvariectomyAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCause of DeathColorectal NeoplasmsCoronary DiseaseEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip FracturesHumansIncidenceMenopauseMiddle AgedEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)

Identifiers

PMID31499528
PMCPMC8120507
OpenAlexW2972456764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.