Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31499516›Full record

Observational studyPediatric research2020

Eye-tracking during simulation-based neonatal airway management.

Michael Wagner, Peter Gröpel, Katharina Bibl, Monika Olischar, Marc A Auerbach, Isabel T Gross

Abstract readObservational StudyVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Evaluating the Value of Eye-Tracking Augmented Debriefing in Medical Simulation-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Simulation in Neonatal Resuscitation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael WagnerDivision of Neonatology, Pediatric Intensive Care and Neuropediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. michael.b.wagner@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-2310
Peter GröpelDepartment of Applied Psychology: Work, Education and Economy, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina BiblDivision of Neonatology, Pediatric Intensive Care and Neuropediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Monika OlischarDivision of Neonatology, Pediatric Intensive Care and Neuropediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Comprehensive Center for Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marc A AuerbachDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Isabel T GrossDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEye-tracking devices help to understand provider behavior during medical tasks. The aim of this study was to assess participants' gaze behavior and usability of eye-tracking glasses during airway management in a simulated neonatal resuscitation.

methodsThis study was an observational simulation-based study. The team member assigned to airway management wore head-mounted eye-tracking glasses. Main outcome measures were airway providers' gaze, dwell time (total amount of time a participant fixates certain areas of interest), and usability of eye-tracking glasses.

resultsData from 13 participants were included. There were significant differences in dwell time during the scenario (p < 0.001), with participants spending twice as much time on the newborn and instruments as on the monitor and other staff. Participants spent about 25% more time focusing on another provider while the provider was inserting the umbilical vein catheter than in all other times of interest (intervals of time with meaningful events) (p = 0.04). The use of the glasses was perceived easy and not disturbing.

conclusionsEye-tracking glasses enhance our understanding of providers' gaze and perspective during simulated neonatal airway management. Future studies will better characterize the ideal use in real situations.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementFixation, OcularInternship and ResidencyResuscitationSimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalAttentionClinical CompetenceEye-Tracking TechnologyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.