Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31499457›Full record

Trial reportJournal of experimental child psychology2019

Age differences in electrocortical reactivity to fearful faces following aversive conditioning in youth.

Katie L Burkhouse, Max Owens, Kiera James, Brandon E Gibb

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katie L BurkhouseDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60608, USA. Electronic address: kburkho@uic.edu.
Max OwensDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.
Kiera JamesDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University (State University of New York), Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.
Brandon E GibbDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University (State University of New York), Binghamton, NY 13902, USA.
Binghamton University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of South Florida St. Petersburg · US

Funding

Supplement to MH098060, “Children’s Attentional Biases: A Key Component of Negative Valence Systems.”R01MH098060 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI GIBB, BRANDON E · 2012 to 2015
$3.1M
Brain-Behavior Markers of Emotion in Depressed Mothers and Their DaughtersK23MH113793 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BURKHOUSE, KATIE L · 2017 to 2021
$1.0M
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH113793NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although biases in the processing of affectively salient stimuli are thought to increase risk for psychopathology across the lifespan, questions remain regarding how these biases develop. The current study tested an aversive conditioning model for the development of children's sensitivity in detecting fearful faces at varying levels of emotional intensity and their facilitated attention to fearful faces assessed via the late positive potential (LPP) event-related potential component. Participants (N = 144, ages 7-11 years) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: an active training condition in which an 85-dB white noise burst was paired with fearful faces, an active control condition in which the white noise was presented randomly throughout the task, and a no-sound condition. Children completed a separate task in which they viewed happy, sad, and fearful child faces at varying levels of emotional intensity while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. Although there were no conditioning group differences in children's sensitivity in detecting facial displays of emotion, there were group differences in LPP magnitude that were moderated by children's age. Among younger children, those in the active conditioning group exhibited smaller LPP amplitudes to high-intensity fearful faces than children in the control groups. However, among older youth, those in the active conditioning group exhibited larger LPP amplitudes to high-intensity fearful faces than children in the control groups. These findings provide insight into how attentional biases may develop in children and how period of development may influence these patterns.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionAttentional BiasBrainChildConditioning, ClassicalElectroencephalographyEmotionsEvoked PotentialsFearFemaleHumansMaleAttention biasChildrenConditioningDevelopmentEvent-related potentialLate positive potential

Identifiers

PMID31499457
PMCPMC6768736
OpenAlexW2971692174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.