ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2019
Cytopathology and ultrastructure identification of primary hepatic acinar cell carcinoma: Case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- An autopsy case of multiple liver metastases from minute pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma clinically diagnosed as primary hepatic acinar cell carcinoma.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA primary acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) of the liver was incidentally diagnosed in a clinically asymptomatic 80-year-old man. This study aimed to delineate critical diagnostic characteristics of an ACC originating uniquely from the liver to improve its future identification. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Enhanced MRI revealed a heterogenous, cystic 7.7 × 11.1 × 10.4 cm tumour occupying hepatic segments II and III. The mass demonstrated mild diffuse enhancement in hepatic arterial phase with minimal portal venous washout in a liver without cirrhotic features. A central stellate T2-hyperintense necrotic scar and outer capsule were apparent. No primary lesion or metastasis outside the liver was discernable. Post-left hepatic lobectomy, the tumour immunophenotype was atypical for presumptive diagnoses of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or cholangiocarcinoma. Extensive morphologic workup on electron microscopy definitively diagnosed primary hepatic ACC by establishing presence of secretory zymogen-like granules, intracytoplasmic microvilli and acinar cell differentiation. Cytopathology revealed cellular lumen expressing PAS-positive diastase-resistant granular cytoplasmic contents. DISCUSSION: This case showcased the novel utility of electron microscopy that was crucial in yielding the definitive diagnosis. The previous literature on hepatic ACC was compiled here in context of the present case. The mechanism of hepatic acinar cell localization was also discussed.
conclusionPrimary hepatic ACC may easily be confused for other lesions due to nonspecific imaging patterns. Specifically, the presence of a central scar without risk factors for HCC can favour a diagnosis of benign entities such as focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH). Electron microscopy presents an important tool to identify primary hepatic ACC and may improve future patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.