ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2020
Protective Effect of Phosphatidylserine Blockade in Hemorrhagic Shock.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-circulating XTEN864-annexin A5 fusion protein for phosphatidylserine-related therapeutic applications.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhosphatidylserine (PS) is a key cell membrane phospholipid normally maintained on the inner cell surface but externalizes to the outer surface in response to cellular stress. We hypothesized that PS exposure mediates organ dysfunction in hemorrhagic shock. Our aims were to evaluate PS blockade on (1) pulmonary, (2) renal, and (3) gut function, as well as (4) serum lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), an inflammatory mediator generated by PS externalization, as a possible mechanism mediating organ dysfunction. MATERIALS AND
methodsRats were either (1) monitored for 130 min (controls, n = 3), (2) hemorrhaged then resuscitated (hemorrhage only group, n = 3), or (3) treated with Diannexin (DA), a PS blocking agent, followed by hemorrhage and resuscitation (DA + hemorrhage group, n = 4). Pulmonary dysfunction was assessed by arterial partial pressure of oxygen, renal dysfunction by serum creatinine, and gut dysfunction by mesenteric endothelial permeability (L
resultsPulmonary: there was no difference in arterial partial pressure of oxygen between groups. Renal: after resuscitation, creatinine levels were lower after PS blockade with DA versus hemorrhage only group (P = 0.01). Gut: L
conclusionsPS blockade with DA decreased renal and gut dysfunction associated with hemorrhagic shock and attenuated the magnitude of LPA generation. Our findings suggest potential for therapeutic targets in the future that could prevent organ dysfunction associated with hemorrhagic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.