Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31499227›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2019

Health coaching to improve self-care of informal caregivers of adults with chronic heart failure - iCare4Me: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Barbara Riegel, Alexandra L Hanlon, Norma B Coe, Karen B Hirschman, Gladys Thomas, Michael Stawnychy, Joyce W Wald, Kathryn H Bowles

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Self-care research: Where are we now? Where are we going?International journal of nursing studies · 2021
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Barbara RiegelUniversity of Pennsylvania, United States of America. Electronic address: briegel@nursing.upenn.edu.
Alexandra L HanlonVirginia Technical University, United States of America.
Norma B CoeUniversity of Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Karen B HirschmanUniversity of Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Gladys ThomasUniversity of Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Michael StawnychyUniversity of Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Joyce W WaldHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Kathryn H BowlesUniversity of Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

Improving Self-Care of Informal Caregivers of Adults with Heart FailureR01NR018196 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RIEGEL, BARBARA J · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR018196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons with chronic heart failure are living longer. These patients typically live in the community and are cared for at home by informal caregivers. These caregivers are an understudied and stressed group.

methodsWe are conducting a two-arm, randomized controlled trial of 250 caregivers of persons with chronic heart failure to evaluate the efficacy of a health coaching intervention. A consecutive sample of participants is being enrolled from both clinic and hospital settings at a single institution affiliated with a large medical center in the northeastern US. Both the intervention and control groups receive tablets programmed to provide standardized health information. In addition, the intervention group receives 10 live coaching sessions delivered virtually by health coaches using the tablets. The intervention is evaluated at 6-months, with self-care as the primary outcome. Cost-effectiveness of the intervention is evaluated at 12-months. We are also enrolling heart failure patients (dyads) whenever possible to explore the effect of caregiver outcomes (self-care, stress, coping, health status) on heart failure patient outcomes (number of hospitalizations and days in the hospital) at 12-months. DISCUSSION: We expect the proposed study to require 5 years for completion. If shown to be efficacious and cost-effective, our virtual health coaching intervention can easily be scaled to. support millions of caregivers worldwide.

Indexed as

AdultCaregiversFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMentoringRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf CareStress, PsychologicalCaregiversHealth coachingHeart failurePsychological stressPsychosocial support systemsSelf-careTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID31499227
PMCPMC6815729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.