ArticleNeuroImage2019
How to test for phasic modulation of neural and behavioural responses.
Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05446350 (Modulating Speech Perception With Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Modulating Speech Perception With Current Stimulation (SPEECHSTIM)
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Manipulating speech perception with amplitude-modulated kilohertz magnetic perturbation (AM-kTMP).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cutaneous Alternating Current Stimulation Can Cause a Phasic Modulation of Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- The Inattentional Rhythm in Audition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- μ-Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Induces Phasic Entrainment and Plastic Facilitation of Corticospinal Excitability.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Balance of power: The choice between trial and participant numbers to optimise the detection of phase-dependent effects.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Alerting attention is sufficient to induce a phase-dependent behavior that can be predicted by frontal EEG.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- Confirming an antiphasic bicyclic pattern of forward entrainment in signal detection: A reanalysis of Sun et al. (2021).The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- Temporal prediction elicits rhythmic preactivation of relevant sensory cortices.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- No evidence of rhythmic visuospatial attention at cued locations in a spatial cuing paradigm, regardless of their behavioural relevance.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- Reliability of Neural Entrainment in the Human Auditory System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Entrainment and Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity - A Review of Proposed Mechanisms of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Review
- Coupling between the phase of a neural oscillation or bodily rhythm with behavior: Evaluation of different statistical procedures.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Endogenous Oscillations Time-Constrain Linguistic Segmentation: Cycling the Garden Path.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Sustained neural rhythms reveal endogenous oscillations supporting speech perception.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Effects of Slow Oscillatory Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortical Excitability Assessed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Speaking rhythmically can shape hearing.Nature human behaviour · 2021Article
- A Comparison of Closed Loop vs. Fixed Frequency tACS on Modulating Brain Oscillations and Visual Detection.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research on whether perception or other processes depend on the phase of neural oscillations is rapidly gaining popularity. However, it is unknown which methods are optimally suited to evaluate the hypothesized phase effect. Using a simulation approach, we here test the ability of different methods to detect such an effect on dichotomous (e.g., "hit" vs "miss") and continuous (e.g., scalp potentials) response variables. We manipulated parameters that characterise the phase effect or define the experimental approach to test for this effect. For each parameter combination and response variable, we identified an optimal method. We found that methods regressing single-trial responses on circular (sine and cosine) predictors perform best for all of the simulated parameters, regardless of the nature of the response variable (dichotomous or continuous). In sum, our study lays a foundation for optimized experimental designs and analyses in future studies investigating the role of phase for neural and behavioural responses. We provide MATLAB code for the statistical methods tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.