Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31498894›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2020

Rare patients in routine care: Treatment and outcome in advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma in the prospective German clinical RCC-Registry.

Michael Staehler, Peter J Goebell, Lothar Müller, Till-Oliver Emde, Natalie Wetzel, Lisa Kruggel, Martina Jänicke, Norbert Marschner, RCC-Registry Group (Tumour Registry of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma)

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Michael StaehlerDepartment of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, University Hospital Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Peter J GoebellAmbulatory Uro-Oncological Therapy Unit Erlangen (AURONTE), Department of Urology l and Clinic for Haematology and Internistic Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Lothar MüllerOncology Outpatient-Centre Unter-Ems, Leer, Germany.
Till-Oliver EmdeOutpatient-Centre and Day-Hospital for Internistic Oncology and Haematology, Recklinghausen, Germany.
Natalie WetzelClinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Lisa KruggelClinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Martina JänickeClinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Norbert MarschnerOutpatient-Centre for Interdisciplinary Oncology and Haematology, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6098-1301
RCC-Registry Group (Tumour Registry of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma)
Iomedico (Germany) · DEDermatologie Freiburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEProsper Hospital · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences Emden Leer · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma is a very rare malignancy that includes several histological subtypes. Each subtype may need to be addressed separately regarding prognosis and treatment; however, no Phase III clinical trial data exist. Thus, treatment recommendations for patients with non-clear cell metastatic RCC (mRCC) remain unclear. We present first prospective data on choice of first- and second-line treatment in routine practice and outcome of patients with papillary mRCC. From the prospective German clinical cohort study (RCC-Registry), 99 patients with papillary mRCC treated with systemic first-line therapy between December 2007 and May 2017 were included. Prospectively enrolled patients who had started first-line treatment until May 15, 2016, were included into the outcome analyses (n = 82). Treatment was similar to therapies used for clear cell mRCC and consisted of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors and recently checkpoint inhibitors. Median progression-free survival from start of first-line treatment was 5.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-9.2) and median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.1-20.0). At data cutoff, 73% of the patients died, 6% were still observed, 12% were lost to follow-up, and 9% were alive at the end of the individual 3-year observation period. Despite the lack of prospective Phase III evidence in patients with papillary mRCC, our real-world data reveal effectiveness of systemic clear cell mRCC therapy in papillary mRCC. The prognosis seems to be inferior for papillary compared to clear cell mRCC. Further studies are needed to identify drivers of effectiveness of systemic therapy for papillary mRCC.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalProspective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalMTOR protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsTOR Serine-Threonine Kinasescohort studiesdisease managementkidney neoplasmsoutcome assessmentoutpatients

Identifiers

PMID31498894
PMCPMC7003963
OpenAlexW2972680222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.