Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31498831›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Current and potential contributions of community pharmacy teams to self-harm and suicide prevention: A qualitative interview study.

Hayley C Gorton, Donna Littlewood, Christine Lotfallah, Matthew Spreadbury, Kai Ling Wong, Patricia Gooding, Darren M Ashcroft

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Providing care to marginalised communities: a qualitative study of community pharmacy teams.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hayley C GortonDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5017-9174
Donna LittlewoodNIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Christine LotfallahDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Matthew SpreadburyDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Kai Ling WongDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Patricia GoodingDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Darren M AshcroftDivision of Pharmacy & Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Huddersfield · GB

Funding

Department of Health GMPSTRC-2012-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide prevention is a global priority. Despite the focus on primary care in suicide prevention, little is known about the contributory role of community pharmacists and nothing about the role of the wider community pharmacy team in this area. We aimed to explore the current and potential role of community pharmacy teams in self-harm and suicide prevention.

methodsWe conducted one-to-one semi-structured qualitative interviews with community pharmacy staff (pharmacists, pre-registration pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, dispensing/pharmacy assistants, delivery drivers) in the North West of England, UK. We identified themes from the interview transcripts through an iterative process of inductive thematic analysis.

resultsWe conducted twenty-five interviews with community pharmacy staff. Many described examples of helping those who were contemplating suicide or self-harm. No participants had received suicide prevention training. We identified six themes. The first two themes (i) Relationship with Patient and (ii) Pharmacy environment were seen as facilitators, which, if supported by (iii) Training, could underpin the final three themes: (iv) Opportunities for contact, (v) Facilitated referral pathway and (v) Restricting access to means. The distinct lack of training should be overcome with evidence-informed training. Referral pathways should be clear and enable direct and accessible referral by community pharmacy teams. There are opportunities for existing pharmacy services and schemes to be adapted to maximise suicide and self-harm prevention activities. Pharmacy teams did not identify themselves to have a clear role in restricting access to medication.

conclusionsPharmacy teams already support patients in relation to self-harm and suicide, often relying on their personal experience in the absence of formal training. With the implementation of evidence-informed training and clear referral pathways, this could be done in a more effectively.

Indexed as

Suicide PreventionAdolescentAdultAgedCommunity Pharmacy ServicesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedSelf-Injurious BehaviorYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31498831
PMCPMC6733435
OpenAlexW2973056039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.